Hana Financial, Inc. v. Geoffrey Allen Corporation et al
Filing
168
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that the Stipulation #167 is approved; and it is further; ORDERED that the Complaint (as defined by and in the Stipulation), the SAC (as defined by and in the Stipulation) and this entire action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
ROBERT B. KAPLAN, P.C. (Bar No. 76950)
rbk@jmbm.com
Two Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3813
Telephone: (415) 398-8080
Facsimile: (415) 398-5584
JS-6
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
THOMAS M. GEHER (Bar No. 130588)
tgeher@jmbm.com
1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067-4308
Telephone: (310) 203-8080
Facsimile: (310) 203-0567
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HANA FINANCIAL, INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
HANA FINANCIAL, INC., a
California corporation,
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant,
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
GEOFFREY ALLEN CORPORATION
dba PERRY ELLIS FOOTWEAR, dba
AKADEMIKS OUTERWEAR dba
TROOP FOOTWEAR, dba 5IVE
JUNGLE FOOTWEAR, dba SCHOOL
OF HARDKNOCKS OUTERWEAR,
FOOTWEAR, dba MONEY
FOOTWEAR, dba GENUINE GRIP
FOOTWEAR, dba MO7, a New Jersey
domestic stock corporation; KI YOUNG
LEE aka KI Y. LEE aka K.Y. LEE;
G.C.B. INC. dba ECKO OUTERWEAR,
a New Jersey domestic profit corporation,
PINK DICE UNLIMITED, INC., a New
Jersey domestic profit corporation,
Judge:
Hon. Michael W.
Fitzgerald
Courtroom: 1600
Case Filed: January 16, 2015
Trial Date: February 8, 2018
Defendants and Counterclaimants.
26
27
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
17
18
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00368-MWF
(JEMx)
_________________________________
28
61331515v1
1
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
2
3
GEOFFREY ALLEN CORPORATION,
A New Jersey Corporation, G.C.B.,
INC., dba ECKO OUTERWEAR, a New
Jersey domestic profit corporation; PINK
DICE UNLIMITED, INC., a New Jersey
domestic profit corporation,
4
Third-Party Plaintiffs,
5
vs.
6
7
8
YOUNG SHIM, an individual, SEAN
CHUN, an individual and MICHAEL
CHOI, an individual, ROES 1-10
Inclusive.
9
Third-Party Defendants.
10
11
12
Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action (the
13
14
("Stipulation") and good cause appearing, it is
ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved; and it is further;
15
ORDERED that the Complaint (as defined by and in the Stipulation),
16
17
18
the SAC (as defined by and in the Stipulation) and this entire action is hereby
dismissed, with prejudice.
19
20
DATED: October 18, 2017
21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
61331515v1
2
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?