Hana Financial, Inc. v. Geoffrey Allen Corporation et al

Filing 168

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that the Stipulation #167 is approved; and it is further; ORDERED that the Complaint (as defined by and in the Stipulation), the SAC (as defined by and in the Stipulation) and this entire action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP ROBERT B. KAPLAN, P.C. (Bar No. 76950) rbk@jmbm.com Two Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3813 Telephone: (415) 398-8080 Facsimile: (415) 398-5584 JS-6 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP THOMAS M. GEHER (Bar No. 130588) tgeher@jmbm.com 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067-4308 Telephone: (310) 203-8080 Facsimile: (310) 203-0567 Attorneys for Plaintiff HANA FINANCIAL, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 HANA FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 GEOFFREY ALLEN CORPORATION dba PERRY ELLIS FOOTWEAR, dba AKADEMIKS OUTERWEAR dba TROOP FOOTWEAR, dba 5IVE JUNGLE FOOTWEAR, dba SCHOOL OF HARDKNOCKS OUTERWEAR, FOOTWEAR, dba MONEY FOOTWEAR, dba GENUINE GRIP FOOTWEAR, dba MO7, a New Jersey domestic stock corporation; KI YOUNG LEE aka KI Y. LEE aka K.Y. LEE; G.C.B. INC. dba ECKO OUTERWEAR, a New Jersey domestic profit corporation, PINK DICE UNLIMITED, INC., a New Jersey domestic profit corporation, Judge: Hon. Michael W. Fitzgerald Courtroom: 1600 Case Filed: January 16, 2015 Trial Date: February 8, 2018 Defendants and Counterclaimants. 26 27 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE vs. 17 18 Case No.: 2:15-cv-00368-MWF (JEMx) _________________________________ 28 61331515v1 1 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 GEOFFREY ALLEN CORPORATION, A New Jersey Corporation, G.C.B., INC., dba ECKO OUTERWEAR, a New Jersey domestic profit corporation; PINK DICE UNLIMITED, INC., a New Jersey domestic profit corporation, 4 Third-Party Plaintiffs, 5 vs. 6 7 8 YOUNG SHIM, an individual, SEAN CHUN, an individual and MICHAEL CHOI, an individual, ROES 1-10 Inclusive. 9 Third-Party Defendants. 10 11 12 Having reviewed the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action (the 13 14 ("Stipulation") and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that the Stipulation is approved; and it is further; 15 ORDERED that the Complaint (as defined by and in the Stipulation), 16 17 18 the SAC (as defined by and in the Stipulation) and this entire action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. 19 20 DATED: October 18, 2017 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 61331515v1 2 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?