Lloyd J. Collins v. State Of California et al

Filing 53

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order 50 : NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT: (see attached) (jm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LAW OFFICES OF BASTIAN & DINI ROBERT L. BASTIAN, JR. [SBN 170121] MARINA R. DINI [SBN 169176] 9025 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 500 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Telephone: (310) 789-1955 Facsimile: (310) 822-1989 email: robbastian@aol.com email: miadini@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiff LLOYD JOSEPH COLLINS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 LLOYD JOSEPH COLLINS, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. Case No. 2:15-CV-00710-FFM DISCOVERY STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER [Before the Honorable Magistrate Frederick F. Mumm] 16 17 18 Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties hereby stipulate to the following protective order: 19 20 In connection with discovery proceedings in this action, the parties may 21 designate any document, thing, material, testimony or other information 22 derived therefrom as "Confidential" under the terms of this Stipulated 23 Protective Order (hereinafter "Order"). Confidential information is information 24 which has not been made public and which concerns or relates to plaintiff 25 LLOYD JOSEPH COLLINS' Request for Production, Set One, propounded on 26 defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Nos. 1-9, 11, 13 and 15 [relating to jail 27 documents and inmate complaints], and plaintiff LLOYD JOSEPH COLLINS’ 28 DISCOVERY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Request for Production, Set One propounded on defendant CHP OFFICER 2 DANIEL J. RINGWELSKI [#019101 [relating to the underlying subject internal 3 affair's investigation, personnel files, performance evaluations and related 4 documents], Nos. 1-3, 5-6, 8-16, 19, 21, 22, 24, 28. 5 6 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT: Good cause is present because 7 widespread dissemination of such materials without district court supervision 8 may interfere with the settled privacy expectations of third party witnesses or 9 the participants in such investigations, exposing such persons to 10 embarrassment unrelated to what is necessary for this litigation and possible 11 retaliation. 12 13 Having found good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by this Court that 14 any items produced by defendants in response to plaintiff LLOYD JOSEPH 15 COLLINS' Request for Production, Set One, propounded on defendant 16 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Nos. 1-9, 11, 13 and 15 [relating to jail 17 documents and inmate complaints] and plaintiff LLOYD JOSEPH COLLINS’ 18 Request for Production, Set One propounded on defendant CHP OFFICER 19 DANIEL J. RINGWELSKI [#019101][relating to the underlying subject internal 20 affair's investigation, personnel files, performance evaluations and related 21 documents] shall be disclosed to counsel for the parties under the following 22 protective order: 23 1. Prior to use in this litigation, the "Confidential Material" shall be 24 stamped or otherwise marked: "Confidential Material subject to protective 25 order." 26 27 28 DISCOVERY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER -2- 1 2. The "Confidential Material" shall be used solely in connection with 2 this litigation in the preparation and trial of this case, or any related 3 proceeding, and not for any other purpose or in any other litigation. 4 3. The "Confidential Material" may be disclosed only to the following 5 persons: 6 (a) counsel for any party to this action; 7 (b) paralegal, stenographic, clerical, and secretarial personnel 8 9 regularly employed by counsel referred to in (a); (c) court personnel including stenographic reporters engaged in 10 proceedings as are necessarily incidental to preparation for the trial of this 11 action, including trial; 12 13 14 15 16 (d) any outside expert or consultant retained in connection with this action and not otherwise employed by either party; (e) any in-house expert designated by any party to testify at trial in this matter; (f) witnesses who may have the documents disclosed to them during 17 deposition proceedings, may not leave the deposition with copies of the 18 documents, and shall be bound by the provisions of paragraph 4; 19 (g) parties to this litigation. 20 4. Each person to whom disclosure is made hereunder shall, prior to 21 the time of such disclosure, be provided by the person furnishing him/her 22 such material, a copy of this order, and shall agree on the record or in writing 23 that he/she has read the protective order and that he/she understands the 24 provisions of the protective order and agrees to be bound by the same. 25 5. At the conclusion of the trial and of any appeal, or upon other 26 termination of this litigation, all "Confidential Material" received in the 27 provision of this order (including any copies made) shall be tendered back to 28 DISCOVERY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER -3- 1 counsel for the County of Los Angeles and State of California. Provisions of 2 this order insofar as they restrict disclosure and use of the "Confidential 3 Material" shall be and remain in effect until further order of this Court. 4 6. The addresses, telephone numbers and other personal identifying 5 information of the parties, or their family members, shall not be disclosed even 6 under the terms of this protective order and such information is to be redacted 7 before any disclosure of "Confidential Material." In the event of inadvertent 8 disclosure, immediate steps will be taken to redact that information before 9 further disclosure. 10 7. Further, the respective counsel for plaintiff, County of Los Angeles 11 and State of California, hereby agree that any and all witness information, 12 including that of plaintiff and/or defendant's date of birth, home addresses, 13 social security number, driver's license number, names and personal 14 information of family members, shall remain redacted from all documents 15 previously disclosed, and to be disclosed under this protective order. 16 8. The foregoing is without prejudice to the right of any party: a) to 17 apply to the court for a further protective order relating to any confidential 18 material, or relating to discovery in this litigation; b) to apply to the Court for 19 an order removing the "Confidential Material" designation from the document; 20 c) to apply to the Court for an order compelling production of documents or 21 modification of this order or for any order permitting disclosure of 22 "Confidential Material" beyond the terms of this order. 23 9. Any document filed with the Court that reveals "Confidential 24 Material" shall be submitted for filing under seal along with an application 25 pursuant to Local Rule 79 filed under a sealed label. The submitted 26 document should be contained in an envelope with a cover sheet as follows: 27 "This document is subject to a protective order issued by the Court and may 28 DISCOVERY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER -4- 1 not be copied or examined except in compliance with that order." Documents 2 so labeled shall be kept by the Court under seal to the extent the Court grants 3 the application and shall be made available only to the Court or counsel. 4 (FFM) 5 10. The persons bound by this agreement agree to subject themselves 6 to the jurisdiction of the above-captioned federal court for purposes of the 7 enforcement of this agreement and further understand that violation of this 8 agreement subjects the violator to the contempt power of the federal court and 9 any other remedies available to the aggrieved parties. 10 11. If a party to whom "Confidential Material" has been produced is 11 subpoenaed or ordered by another court or administrative agency to produce 12 information that is subject to this protective order, such party shall notify 13 promptly the party who produced the material of the pending subpoena or 14 order. It is the producing party’s responsibility to take whatever action it 15 deems appropriate to challenge the subpoena or order in the issuing court or 16 agency. The party subject to the subpoena or order shall not produce any 17 "Confidential Material" in advance of the date required by the subpoena or 18 order. Nothing herein shall be construed as relieving anyone subject to this 19 order from any obligation to comply with a validly issued subpoena or 20 order. (FFM) 21 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 22 23 24 25 DATED: October 27, 2015 /S/ FREDERICK F. MUMM THE HON. FREDERICK F. MUMM United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 DISCOVERY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?