Tammy Lynn Cameron v. Lauren Brown et al

Filing 61

AMENDED JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS LAUREN BROWN AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (ah)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

PAUL B. BEACH, State Bar No. 166265
DENNIS M. GONZALES, Bar No. 59414
RAYMOND W. SAKAI, State Bar No. 193507
[e-mail]
LAUREN T. KRAPF, State Bar No. 292115
[e-mail]
LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC
100 West Broadway, Suite 1200
Glendale, California 91210-1219
Telephone No. [phone]
Facsimile No. [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
Lauren Brown and County of Los Angeles

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
LAUREN BROWN, an individual;
)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a
public entity; and DOES 1 through 10, )
inclusive.
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
TAMMY LYNN CAMERON,

Case No. CV 15-00774-RGK (JPRx)
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
AMENDED [PROPOSED]
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS LAUREN BROWN
AND COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

19
20

The Court having entered an Order granting summary judgment as to all

21

claims brought against Defendants Lauren Brown and County of Los Angeles

22

[57]:

23

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal

24

Rules of Civil Procedure, that there is no just reason for delay in entering full and

25

final judgment in favor of Defendants Lauren Brown and County of Los Angeles

26

and against Plaintiff Tammy Lynn Cameron.

27

///

28

///
1
CAMERON\Amended Proposed Judgment in favor of Defendants

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that

2

judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants Lauren Brown and County of

3

Los Angeles and against Plaintiff Tammy Lynn Cameron. Defendants Lauren

4

Brown and County of Los Angeles shall be entitled to costs of suit incurred

5

herein pursuant to Local Rule 54-1.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10

Dated: March 9, 2016

_________________________
Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CAMERON\Amended Proposed Judgment in favor of Defendants