Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Scott Alexander Thompson

Filing 35

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Judgment in favor of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC against Scott Alexander Thompson. See Order for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY FA NOTES HOLDINGS LLC, Petitioners, JUDGMENT v. JS-6 16 17 18 19 Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00851 JAK (JCx) SCOTT ALEXANDER THOMPSON a/k/a SCOTT A. THOMPSON a/k/a SCOTT THOMPSON, Respondent. 20 21 JUDGMENT 22 23 AND NOW, upon consideration of Petitioners Morgan Stanley Smith 24 Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC’s 25 Application for Entry of Default Judgment and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) 26 27 and Local Rule 55-1, default judgment is hereby entered in favor of Morgan 28 1 1 Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings 2 LLC and against Respondent Scott Alexander Thompson a/k/a Scott A. Thompson 3 4 5 a/k/a Scott Thompson (“Thompson”) as follows: 1. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration Award served 6 on October 6, 2014 in the matter captioned, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC 7 8 and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC v. Scott Alexander 9 Thompson, FINRA Dispute Resolution Case No. 14-00349, is CONFIRMED; 10 11 2. Judgment is entered in favor Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and 12 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC and against Scott 13 Alexander Thompson a/k/a Scott A. Thompson a/k/a Scott Thompson in the 14 15 16 17 amount of $550,439.95, representing compensatory damages and pre-Award interest. IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 Dated: 5/26/15 __________________________ Hon. John A. Kronstadt United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?