Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Scott Alexander Thompson
Filing
35
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Judgment in favor of Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC against Scott Alexander Thompson. See Order for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY
LLC and MORGAN STANLEY SMITH
BARNEY FA NOTES HOLDINGS LLC,
Petitioners,
JUDGMENT
v.
JS-6
16
17
18
19
Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-00851
JAK (JCx)
SCOTT ALEXANDER THOMPSON
a/k/a SCOTT A. THOMPSON
a/k/a SCOTT THOMPSON,
Respondent.
20
21
JUDGMENT
22
23
AND NOW, upon consideration of Petitioners Morgan Stanley Smith
24
Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC’s
25
Application for Entry of Default Judgment and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)
26
27
and Local Rule 55-1, default judgment is hereby entered in favor of Morgan
28
1
1
Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings
2
LLC and against Respondent Scott Alexander Thompson a/k/a Scott A. Thompson
3
4
5
a/k/a Scott Thompson (“Thompson”) as follows:
1.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration Award served
6
on October 6, 2014 in the matter captioned, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
7
8
and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC v. Scott Alexander
9
Thompson, FINRA Dispute Resolution Case No. 14-00349, is CONFIRMED;
10
11
2.
Judgment is entered in favor Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and
12
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC and against Scott
13
Alexander Thompson a/k/a Scott A. Thompson a/k/a Scott Thompson in the
14
15
16
17
amount of $550,439.95, representing compensatory damages and pre-Award
interest.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated: 5/26/15
__________________________
Hon. John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?