Aaron Harvey Beitch v. Wheeler et al

Filing 159

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, Related to: Jury Verdict 155 . IT IS ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. That Defendant Michael Wheeler have judgment against Plaintiff Aaron Harvey Beitch. 2. That Plaintiff Aaron Harvey Beitch take nothing on all claims alleged against Defendant Michael Wheeler. 2. As a prevailing party, Defendant Michael Wheeler is entitled to recover his costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AARON HARVEY BEITCH,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

vs.

15
16

OFFICER MICHAEL WHEELER,

17

Defendant.

18

) Case No. CV 15-872-GW(GJS)
)
) Honorable George H. Wu
)
)
) JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

19
20

This action came on regularly for trial on March 27, 2018, in Courtroom 9D

21

of the above-entitled Court, the Honorable District Court Judge George H. Wu

22

presiding. Plaintiff Aaron Harvey Beitch (“Plaintiff”) appeared pro se. Defendant

23

Officer Michael Wheeler (“Defendant”) appeared through attorneys Dennis M.

24

Gonzales and Raymond W. Sakai of Lawrence Beach Allen & Choi, PC.
On March 28, 2018, the jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of

25
26

Defendant.

27

///

28

///
1
BEITCH\PROPOSED JUDGMENT

1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

2

1.

3
4
5
6
7

That Defendant Michael Wheeler have judgment against Plaintiff

Aaron Harvey Beitch.
2.

That Plaintiff Aaron Harvey Beitch take nothing on all claims

alleged against Defendant Michael Wheeler.
2.

As a prevailing party, Defendant Michael Wheeler is entitled to

recover his costs.

8
9
10

Dated: April 2, 2018

11

__________________________________
HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
BEITCH\PROPOSED JUDGMENT

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2

I, Debra L. Ard, am employed in the aforesaid County, State of California;
I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action; my business
address is 100 West Broadway, Suite 1200, Glendale, CA 91210.

3
4
5
6

On March 29, 2018, I served the foregoing [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
on the interested parties in this action by placing a true copy thereof, enclosed in a
sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

7
8
9

Aaron Harvey Beitch
P.O. Box 35403
Tuscon, AZ 85740-5043

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

BY MAIL: I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection
and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be
deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully
prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware
that on motion of the party service, service is presumed invalid if postal
cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit
for mailing in affidavit.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the
office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was
made.

19
20

Executed on March 29, 2018, at Glendale, California.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By

_
Declarant