L. E. v. Miller Children's & Women's Hospital Long Beach et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED ACTION by Judge George H. Wu 1. The Parties stipulation is approved; 2. Central District of California case number 2:15-CV-01010-GW-RZ styled L.E.,a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, ISIS FRANCO, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., is hereby remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (remanding case to Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case number BC558236) Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (pj)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 L.E., a minor, by and through her Guardian ) Case No. CV 15-1010-GW(RZx) ad Litem, ISIS FRANCO, ) ) ORDER TO REMAND REMOVED Plaintiff, ) ACTION vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) MILLER CHILDREN’S & WOMEN’S ) HOSPITAL LONG BEACH; LOUIS P. ) THERIOT, M.D.; JOHN SAMSON, M.D.; ) PETER WELTY, M.D.; JOHN GURSKIS, ) M.D.; LARRY NESTOR, M.D.; ) MICHAEL COOPER, M.D.; and DOES 1 ) THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 19 20 On March 27, 2015, the Parties to the above-referenced action filed a Stipulation 21 Of Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant To FRCP §41(A)(1)(A)(ii) and to Remand Removed 22 Action. The Court having reviewed that stipulation and good cause appearing, orders as 23 follows: 24 1. The Parties’ stipulation is approved; 25 2. Central District of California case number 2:15-CV-01010-GW-RZ styled L.E., 26 a minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, ISIS FRANCO, Plaintiff, vs. UNITED 27 28 -1– Order to Remand Removed Action 1 STATES OF AMERICA, et al., is hereby remanded to Los Angeles County Superior 2 Court. 3 4 DATED: This 31st day of March, 2015 5 6 7 __________________________________ HON. GEORGE H. WU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2– Order to Remand Removed Action

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?