Gustavo Gomez v. Julie Jones et al
Filing
13
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United St ates Magistrate Judge 10 . Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action, without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction with respect to Ground One, and with prejudice with respect to Ground Two. (kl)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
GUSTAVO GOMEZ,
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
14
JULIE JONES, et al.,
Respondent.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 15-1062-DMG (JEM)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file,
18
and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed
19
Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and
20
Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected.
21
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
The Court accepts the findings and
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition for Writ
23
of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action, without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction with respect
24
to Ground One, and with prejudice with respect to Ground Two.
25
26
DATED:
27
28
August 17, 2015
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?