Jocelyn Annette Johnson v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc et al

Filing 188

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt, (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). Plaintiff Jocelyn Annette Johnson shall take nothing and that Defendants are entitled to judgment against plaintiff Jocelyn Annette Johnson. (ah)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOCELYN ANNETTE JOHNSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

vs.
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES,
U.S.A., INC., B.A.R., PENSKE
TOYOTA, CARSON TOYOTA,
NORWALK TOYOTA,
Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

) NO. 2:15-cv-01284-JAK-MRW
)
) JUDGMENT
)
) JS-6
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

The Court, having heard the motion for summary judgment filed by

25

defendants Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.’s (“TMS”) and Apaulo, Inc. dba

26

Norwalk Toyota’s (collectively, “Defendants”) against plaintiff Jocelyn Annette

27

Johnson on June 27, 2016, and thereafter granting the motion in its entirety:

28

///
TMS1510934\MOTIONS\JDGM01
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1

JUDGMENT AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: That plaintiff

2

Jocelyn Annette Johnson shall take nothing and that Defendants are entitled to

3

judgment against plaintiff Jocelyn Annette Johnson. Furthermore, by reason of

4

said judgment and pursuant to Rule 54(d)(1) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

5

and Local Rules 54-1 and 54-2, Defendants may seek to recover costs pursuant to

6

an application submitted under those rules.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

Dated: December 15, 2016

10
11
12

HON. JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TMS1510934\MOTIONS\JDGM01
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2

JUDGMENT AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT