Novelty Textile Inc v. Shosho Fashion Inc et al

Filing 22

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Case 21 . THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal; 3. The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action; and 4. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement entered into in this matter. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 NOVELTY TEXTILE, INC., a California Case No.: CV15-1293-CBM (AGRx) Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall Corporation, Presiding Plaintiff, ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITH v. PREJUDICE [JS-6] 14 15 16 SHOSHO FASHION, INC.; et al. Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION ORDER: 1 2 3 FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 4 1. 5 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 6 2. 7 8 9 10 11 12 This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal; 3. The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action; and 4. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement entered into in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: November 16, 2015 By: ________________________________ HON. CONSUELO B. MARSHALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?