Novelty Textile Inc v. Shosho Fashion Inc et al
Filing
22
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Case 21 . THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal; 3. The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action; and 4. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement entered into in this matter. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
12
13
NOVELTY TEXTILE, INC., a California Case No.: CV15-1293-CBM (AGRx)
Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall
Corporation,
Presiding
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
DISMISS ACTION WITH
v.
PREJUDICE [JS-6]
14
15
16
SHOSHO FASHION, INC.; et al.
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION
ORDER:
1
2
3
FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY
ORDERED:
4
1.
5
41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
6
2.
7
8
9
10
11
12
This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.
This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement
agreement that gave rise to this dismissal;
3.
The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees as
incurred against one another in connection with this action; and
4.
The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement
agreement entered into in this matter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
16
17
Dated: November 16, 2015
By: ________________________________
HON. CONSUELO B. MARSHALL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?