Axis Insurance Company v. Inter/Media Time Buying Corporation et al

Filing 51

JUDGMENT 50 by Judge Dolly M. Gee : AXIS has no duty to defend or indemnify any of the defendants against the cross-complaint filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC495560, captioned Inter/Media Time Buying Corporation, et al. v. Bio tab Nutraceuticals, Inc., et al. (Cross-Complaint) and AXIS is entitled to judgment on the Complaints first claim for relief;2. The parties have stipulated to the fact that AXIS has paid nothing to or onbehalf of any of the Inter/Media individuals or entities. Therefore, thesecond claim for relief in the Complaint for reimbursement is moot; and3. AXIS is entitled to costs of suit.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

) Case No.: CV 15-1380-DMG (AJWx)
)
)
Plaintiff,
) JUDGMENT [50]
)
vs.
)
)
)
INTER/MEDIA TIME BUYING
)
CORPORATION, a California
corporation; INTERQUANTUM LLC, )
a California limited liability company; )
)
BELLATRIX MEDIA, INC., a
California corporation; INTER/IMAGE )
)
PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California
)
corporation; INTER/POST
)
PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California
)
corporation; INTER/MEDIA
)
INTERACTIVE, INC., a California
)
corporation; MEDIAPOINT
NETWORK, INC., a California
)
corporation; INTER/MEDIA
)
ADVERTISING, INC., a California
)
Corporation; and ROBERT YALLEN, )
an individual,
)
)
Defendants.
)
AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY,

25
26
27
28

JUDGMENT
Page 1

1

Based on the Court’s order entered on June 8, 2015 denying defendants’

2

(collectively “Inter/Media”) motion for summary judgment and sua sponte

3

granting partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff AXIS Insurance

4

Company (AXIS”) on the issue of its duty to defend, the Court enters judgment

5

in the above-entitled matter as follows:

6

1. AXIS has no duty to defend or indemnify any of the defendants against the

7

cross-complaint filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No.

8

BC495560, captioned Inter/Media Time Buying Corporation, et al. v.

9

Biotab Nutraceuticals, Inc., et al. (“Cross-Complaint”) and AXIS is

10

entitled to judgment on the Complaint’s first claim for relief;

11

2. The parties have stipulated to the fact that AXIS has paid nothing to or on

12

behalf of any of the Inter/Media individuals or entities. Therefore, the

13

second claim for relief in the Complaint for reimbursement is moot; and

14

3. AXIS is entitled to costs of suit.

15
16
17
18

DATED: June 30, 2015

_______________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JUDGMENT
Page 2