Edwin McMillan v. Ronald Rackley

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/1/15 ORDERING that this case is TRANSFERRED to the Central District of California.(Dillon, M) [Transferred from California Eastern on 3/2/2015.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 EDWIN McMILLAN, 10 Petitioner, 11 12 No. 2:15-cv-0404 DAD P v. ORDER RONALD RACKLEY, 13 Respondent. 14 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 15 16 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. The application for relief pending before this court attacks a judgment of conviction 17 18 issued by the Ventura County Superior Court. While both this court and the United States 19 District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th 20 Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the 21 resolution of petitioner’s application are more readily available in Ventura County. Id. at 499 22 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 23 Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis; and 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of 2 California. 3 Dated: March 1, 2015 4 5 6 7 DAD:10/mp mcmi0404.108 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?