Jazmine Jamal Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 32

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Based upon the parties Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,314.10 a s authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Petition for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 28) is hereby dismissed as moot. (lwag)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney at Law: 119433 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jazmine Jamal Jones 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAZMINE JAMAL JONES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:15-cv-01501-KES {PROPOSED} ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,314.10 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 28) is hereby dismissed as moot. DATE: April 04, 2016 25 26 ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?