Benchmark Insurance Company v. Dismon Corp.
Filing
73
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order 70 : (see attached) (jm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Susan F. Halman, State Bar No. 111511
E-mail: shalman@selvinwraith.com
Nancy J. Strout, State Bar No. 121096
E-mail: nstrout@selvinwraith.com
SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP
505 14th Street, Suite 1200
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 874-1811
Facsimile: (510) 465-8976
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BENCHMARK INSURANCE COMPANY
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
12 BENCHMARK INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Kansas corporation,
13
For All Purposes Assigned To: Judge Terry J. Hatter,
Jr., Courtroom 17 (Spring St. Level)
Discovery Matters Only Assigned To: Magistrate
Judge Frederick F. Mumm, Courtroom E – 9th Floor
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
16
PROTECTIVE ORDER
DISMON CORP., a California
corporation; JAAFAR RAMIN
18 JAAFARIAN, an individual; MASOUD
H. TEHRANI, an individual; FATEMEH
19
A. TEHRANI, an individual; and TARA
20 TEHRANI, an individual,
17
21
Complaint Filed: March 3, 2015
FAC Filed: May 8, 2015
Defendants.
22
Having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Protective Order, and good
23
24
cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that the following protective order under Federal Rule of Civil
25
26
Procedure 26(c) shall govern proceedings in this matter:
27
1.
28
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
This Protective Order prevents the disclosure of documents and other
1
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
information subject to a joint attorney client privilege shared by Benchmark Insurance
2
Company (“BIC”) on the one hand, and Dismon Corp. and Jaafar Ramin Jaafarian
3
(collectively, “Dismon”) on the other hand (the “Protective Order”). The information
4
sought to be protected was generated in connection with claims made against Dismon
5
by Masoud Tehrani, Fatemeh Tehrani and/or Tara Tehrani, including but not limited to
6
the action entitled Masoud H. Tehrani and Fatemeh A. Tehrani. v. Dismon Corp., et
7
al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, Torrance Courthouse, Southwest Judicial
8
District, Case No. YCO70534 (collectively, the “Tehrani Claim”). The Parties are
9
joint holders of this privilege and neither can waive the privilege on behalf of the other
10
party. The purpose of the Protective Order is to protect the disclosure of matters
11
subject to this joint privilege to any third party.
12
2.
13
DEFINED WORDS AND PHRASES
The following words and phrases have special definitions as used in this
14
Protective Order:
15
2.1
Attorney-Client Privilege means “information transmitted between a
16
client and his or her lawyer in the course of that relationship and in confidence by a
17
means which, so far as the client is aware, discloses the information to no third persons
18
other than those who are present to further the interest of the client in the consultation
19
or those to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the transmission of the
20
information or the accomplishment of the purpose for which the lawyer is consulted,
21
and includes a legal opinion formed and the advice given by the lawyer in the course
22
of that relationship.” Cal. Evid. Code § 952.
23
24
2.2
Challenging Party means a Party or Non-Party that challenges the
designation of information or items under the Protective Order.
25
2.3
Counsel means Outside Counsel and (as well as their support staff).
26
2.4
Designating Party means a Party or Non-Party that designates
27
information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as
28
“Confidential”.
2
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
2.5
Disclosure Or Discovery Material means all items or information,
2
regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including,
3
among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things) that are produced or
4
generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.
5
2.6
Joint Attorney Client Privilege means the Attorney Client Privilege as
6
defined in 2.1, above, held jointly by BIC and Dismon over communications regarding
7
the defense of Dismon to the Tehrani Claim.
8
9
2.7
Non-Party and Non-Parties means any natural person, partnership,
corporation, association, or other legal entity not currently a Party to this action; parties
10
in default in this action (Masoud Tehrani, Fatemeh Tehrani and Tara Tehrani) are
11
considered Non-Parties.
12
2.8
Outside Counsel means attorneys who are not employees of a Party but
13
are retained to represent or advise a Party and have appeared in this action on behalf of
14
that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that Party.
15
2.9
Party and Parties means any party to this action, including all of its
16
officers, directors, employees, and Outside Counsel (and their support staff), but
17
excluding any party in default in this action.
18
19
2.10 Producing Party means a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure
Or Discovery Material in this action.
20
2.11 Professional Vendors means persons or entities that provide litigation
21
support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or
22
demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and
23
their employees and subcontractors.
24
2.12 Protected Material means any Disclosure Or Discovery Material that is
25
designated as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND
26
DISMON.”
27
28
2.13 Receiving Party means a Party that receives Disclosure Or Discovery
Material from a Producing Party.
3
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
3.
2
SCOPE
3.1
The protections conferred by the Protective Order cover Protected
3
Material and any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies,
4
excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or
5
presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material, and
6
information and/or documents any Party acquires informally that may be considered
7
“JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON.”
8
4.
9
DURATION
4.1
The confidentiality obligations imposed by the Protective Order shall
10
remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order
11
or arbitrator’s order otherwise directs, even after final disposition of this action.
12
5.
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
13
5.1
14
Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection
15
under the Protective Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific
16
material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take
17
care to designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral
18
or written communications that qualify - so that other portions of the material,
19
documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not
20
swept unjustifiably within the ambit of the Protective Order. Designations that are
21
shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g.,
22
to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose
23
unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), may expose the Designating Party
24
to sanctions.
25
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items
26
designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the
27
level of protection initially asserted, then the Designating Party must promptly notify
28
all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
4
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
5.2
2
Except as otherwise provided in the Protective Order, or as otherwise stipulated
Manner and Timing of Designations
3
or ordered, Disclosure Or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under the
4
Protective Order must be clearly designated as such before the material is disclosed or
5
produced.
6
5.3
7
(a) For information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions
Form of Designation
8
or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the Producing Party must affix the legend
9
“JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON” to
10
each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material
11
on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the
12
protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
13
(b) For testimony given in deposition or in other pre-trial or trial proceedings,
14
that the Party or Non-Party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record,
15
before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected
16
testimony. When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that
17
is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony
18
may qualify for protection, the Party or Non-Party that sponsors, offers, or gives the
19
testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other
20
proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to twenty (20) days to identify the specific
21
portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought. Only those portions of the
22
testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the twenty (20) days
23
shall be covered by the provisions of the Protective Order. Alternatively, a Party or
24
Non-Party offering or sponsoring the testimony may specify, at the deposition or up to
25
twenty (20) days afterwards if that period is properly invoked, that the entire transcript
26
shall be treated as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND
27
DISMON”.
28
A Party shall give all other Parties notice if it reasonably expects a deposition,
5
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
hearing, or other proceeding to include Protected Material so that there is no disclosure
2
that violates the Protective Order. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition
3
shall not in any way affect its designation as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT
4
PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON.”
5
Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the
6
title page that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be
7
followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been
8
designated as Protected Material. The Designating Party shall inform the court
9
reporter of these requirements.
10
(c) For information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any
11
other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior
12
of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend
13
“JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON.” If
14
only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing
15
Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).
16
5.4
17
If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or
Inadvertent Failures to Designate
18
items as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND
19
DISMON” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure
20
protection under the Protective Order for such material. If material is appropriately
21
designated as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND
22
DISMON” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely
23
notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material
24
is treated in accordance with the provisions of the Protective Order.
25
6.
CHALLENGING PROTECTED MATERIAL DESIGNATIONS
26
6.1
27
Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of material as Protected
28
Timing of Challenges
Material at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s designation
6
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
of material as Protected Material is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial
2
unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the
3
litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a designation by electing not to
4
mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed.
5
6.2
6
The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process by providing
Meet and Confer
7
written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each
8
challenge. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must
9
begin the process by conferring directly (in writing or voice-to-voice dialogue). In
10
conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the
11
confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an
12
opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if
13
no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A
14
Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has
15
engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party
16
is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner.
17
6.3
18
A Challenging Party, after considering the justification offered by the
19
Designating Party, may file and serve a motion consistent with the Protective Order
20
that identifies the challenged material that was designated as Protected Material and
21
that sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be
22
accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms the movant has complied with
23
the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph.
24
Judicial Intervention
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the
25
Designating Party. Until the Court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to
26
afford the Designated Material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled
27
under the Producing Party’s designation.
28
///
7
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
7.
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
2
7.1
3
A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by
Basic Principles
4
another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,
5
defending, or attempting to settle this action. Such Protected Material may be
6
disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in the
7
Protective Order.
8
9
10
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a
location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons
authorized under the Protective Order.
11
7.2
12
Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the
Disclosure of Protected Material
13
Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated
14
“JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON” only
15
to the following persons or entities:
16
(a)
the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as
17
employees of said Outside Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the
18
information for this litigation;
19
20
(b)
the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party to whom
disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation;
21
(c)
the Judge, the Court, and its personnel;
22
(d)
court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and
23
24
25
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation;
(e)
the author or recipient of the document or the original source of the
information.
26
7.3
27
Documents containing Protected Material shall not be filed with the Court
28
The Filing of Protected Material with the Court
absent: (a) consent from the Designating Party; or (b) the issuance of a sealing order
8
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
from the Court addressing such privileged and/or confidential information. If the
2
Designating Party does not consent, the Party seeking to file documents containing
3
Protected Material with the Court shall file a motion or an application for an order
4
sealing the document, pursuant to this Court’s Civil Local Rule L.R. 79-5, including
5
the procedures described in the Court’s Guide to electronically Filing Under-Seal
6
Documents in Civil Cases, available on the Court’s website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov.
7
8.
8
9
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL.
8.1
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has
disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under
10
the Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the
11
Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all
12
copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom
13
unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of the Protective Order, and (d)
14
request such person or persons to execute an acknowledgment and agreement to be
15
bound by the Protective Order.
16
9.
17
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED
IN OTHER LITIGATION.
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that
18
19
compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “JOINT
20
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON” that Party
21
must:
22
23
24
(a)
promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall
include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
(b)
promptly notify in writing the party, who caused the subpoena or order, to
25
issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or
26
order is subject to the Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of the
27
Protective Order; and
28
(c)
cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued
9
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
1
by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
2
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order in such other litigation,
3
the Party served with the subpoena or court order in that litigation shall not produce
4
any information designated in this action as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT
5
PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON” before a determination by the court
6
from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the
7
Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and
8
expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in
9
these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party
10
in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.
11
10.
MISCELLANEOUS
12
10.1 Right to Further Relief
13
Nothing in the Protective Order abridges the right of any person to seek its
14
modification by the Court in the future.
15
10.2 Right to Assert Other Objections
16
By entering in to the Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise
17
would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground
18
not addressed in the Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object
19
on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by the Protective
20
Order.
21
22
Dated:
May 16, 2016
/S/ Frederick F. Mumm
Honorable Frederick F. Mumm
United States District Court
23
24
25
26
197125.doc
27
28
10
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?