Benchmark Insurance Company v. Dismon Corp.

Filing 73

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order 70 : (see attached) (jm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Susan F. Halman, State Bar No. 111511 E-mail: shalman@selvinwraith.com Nancy J. Strout, State Bar No. 121096 E-mail: nstrout@selvinwraith.com SELVIN WRAITH HALMAN LLP 505 14th Street, Suite 1200 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1811 Facsimile: (510) 465-8976 Attorneys for Plaintiff BENCHMARK INSURANCE COMPANY 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 12 BENCHMARK INSURANCE COMPANY, a Kansas corporation, 13 For All Purposes Assigned To: Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr., Courtroom 17 (Spring St. Level) Discovery Matters Only Assigned To: Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm, Courtroom E – 9th Floor Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 PROTECTIVE ORDER DISMON CORP., a California corporation; JAAFAR RAMIN 18 JAAFARIAN, an individual; MASOUD H. TEHRANI, an individual; FATEMEH 19 A. TEHRANI, an individual; and TARA 20 TEHRANI, an individual, 17 21 Complaint Filed: March 3, 2015 FAC Filed: May 8, 2015 Defendants. 22 Having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation for Protective Order, and good 23 24 cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the following protective order under Federal Rule of Civil 25 26 Procedure 26(c) shall govern proceedings in this matter: 27 1. 28 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS This Protective Order prevents the disclosure of documents and other 1 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 information subject to a joint attorney client privilege shared by Benchmark Insurance 2 Company (“BIC”) on the one hand, and Dismon Corp. and Jaafar Ramin Jaafarian 3 (collectively, “Dismon”) on the other hand (the “Protective Order”). The information 4 sought to be protected was generated in connection with claims made against Dismon 5 by Masoud Tehrani, Fatemeh Tehrani and/or Tara Tehrani, including but not limited to 6 the action entitled Masoud H. Tehrani and Fatemeh A. Tehrani. v. Dismon Corp., et 7 al., Los Angeles County Superior Court, Torrance Courthouse, Southwest Judicial 8 District, Case No. YCO70534 (collectively, the “Tehrani Claim”). The Parties are 9 joint holders of this privilege and neither can waive the privilege on behalf of the other 10 party. The purpose of the Protective Order is to protect the disclosure of matters 11 subject to this joint privilege to any third party. 12 2. 13 DEFINED WORDS AND PHRASES The following words and phrases have special definitions as used in this 14 Protective Order: 15 2.1 Attorney-Client Privilege means “information transmitted between a 16 client and his or her lawyer in the course of that relationship and in confidence by a 17 means which, so far as the client is aware, discloses the information to no third persons 18 other than those who are present to further the interest of the client in the consultation 19 or those to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for the transmission of the 20 information or the accomplishment of the purpose for which the lawyer is consulted, 21 and includes a legal opinion formed and the advice given by the lawyer in the course 22 of that relationship.” Cal. Evid. Code § 952. 23 24 2.2 Challenging Party means a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under the Protective Order. 25 2.3 Counsel means Outside Counsel and (as well as their support staff). 26 2.4 Designating Party means a Party or Non-Party that designates 27 information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 28 “Confidential”. 2 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 2.5 Disclosure Or Discovery Material means all items or information, 2 regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, 3 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things) that are produced or 4 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 5 2.6 Joint Attorney Client Privilege means the Attorney Client Privilege as 6 defined in 2.1, above, held jointly by BIC and Dismon over communications regarding 7 the defense of Dismon to the Tehrani Claim. 8 9 2.7 Non-Party and Non-Parties means any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not currently a Party to this action; parties 10 in default in this action (Masoud Tehrani, Fatemeh Tehrani and Tara Tehrani) are 11 considered Non-Parties. 12 2.8 Outside Counsel means attorneys who are not employees of a Party but 13 are retained to represent or advise a Party and have appeared in this action on behalf of 14 that Party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that Party. 15 2.9 Party and Parties means any party to this action, including all of its 16 officers, directors, employees, and Outside Counsel (and their support staff), but 17 excluding any party in default in this action. 18 19 2.10 Producing Party means a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure Or Discovery Material in this action. 20 2.11 Professional Vendors means persons or entities that provide litigation 21 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 22 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 23 their employees and subcontractors. 24 2.12 Protected Material means any Disclosure Or Discovery Material that is 25 designated as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND 26 DISMON.” 27 28 2.13 Receiving Party means a Party that receives Disclosure Or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 3. 2 SCOPE 3.1 The protections conferred by the Protective Order cover Protected 3 Material and any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, 4 excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or 5 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material, and 6 information and/or documents any Party acquires informally that may be considered 7 “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON.” 8 4. 9 DURATION 4.1 The confidentiality obligations imposed by the Protective Order shall 10 remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 11 or arbitrator’s order otherwise directs, even after final disposition of this action. 12 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 13 5.1 14 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection 15 under the Protective Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific 16 material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take 17 care to designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral 18 or written communications that qualify - so that other portions of the material, 19 documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not 20 swept unjustifiably within the ambit of the Protective Order. Designations that are 21 shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., 22 to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose 23 unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), may expose the Designating Party 24 to sanctions. 25 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items 26 designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the 27 level of protection initially asserted, then the Designating Party must promptly notify 28 all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 4 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 5.2 2 Except as otherwise provided in the Protective Order, or as otherwise stipulated Manner and Timing of Designations 3 or ordered, Disclosure Or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under the 4 Protective Order must be clearly designated as such before the material is disclosed or 5 produced. 6 5.3 7 (a) For information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions Form of Designation 8 or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the Producing Party must affix the legend 9 “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON” to 10 each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material 11 on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 12 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 13 (b) For testimony given in deposition or in other pre-trial or trial proceedings, 14 that the Party or Non-Party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, 15 before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected 16 testimony. When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that 17 is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony 18 may qualify for protection, the Party or Non-Party that sponsors, offers, or gives the 19 testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other 20 proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to twenty (20) days to identify the specific 21 portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought. Only those portions of the 22 testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the twenty (20) days 23 shall be covered by the provisions of the Protective Order. Alternatively, a Party or 24 Non-Party offering or sponsoring the testimony may specify, at the deposition or up to 25 twenty (20) days afterwards if that period is properly invoked, that the entire transcript 26 shall be treated as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND 27 DISMON”. 28 A Party shall give all other Parties notice if it reasonably expects a deposition, 5 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 hearing, or other proceeding to include Protected Material so that there is no disclosure 2 that violates the Protective Order. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition 3 shall not in any way affect its designation as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT 4 PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON.” 5 Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the 6 title page that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be 7 followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been 8 designated as Protected Material. The Designating Party shall inform the court 9 reporter of these requirements. 10 (c) For information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any 11 other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior 12 of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend 13 “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON.” If 14 only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing 15 Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s). 16 5.4 17 If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or Inadvertent Failures to Designate 18 items as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND 19 DISMON” does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure 20 protection under the Protective Order for such material. If material is appropriately 21 designated as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND 22 DISMON” after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely 23 notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material 24 is treated in accordance with the provisions of the Protective Order. 25 6. CHALLENGING PROTECTED MATERIAL DESIGNATIONS 26 6.1 27 Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of material as Protected 28 Timing of Challenges Material at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s designation 6 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 of material as Protected Material is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial 2 unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the 3 litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a designation by electing not to 4 mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 5 6.2 6 The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process by providing Meet and Confer 7 written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each 8 challenge. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith and must 9 begin the process by conferring directly (in writing or voice-to-voice dialogue). In 10 conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the 11 confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an 12 opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if 13 no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A 14 Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has 15 engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party 16 is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner. 17 6.3 18 A Challenging Party, after considering the justification offered by the 19 Designating Party, may file and serve a motion consistent with the Protective Order 20 that identifies the challenged material that was designated as Protected Material and 21 that sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be 22 accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms the movant has complied with 23 the meet and confer requirements imposed by the preceding paragraph. 24 Judicial Intervention The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the 25 Designating Party. Until the Court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to 26 afford the Designated Material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled 27 under the Producing Party’s designation. 28 /// 7 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 2 7.1 3 A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by Basic Principles 4 another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, 5 defending, or attempting to settle this action. Such Protected Material may be 6 disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in the 7 Protective Order. 8 9 10 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under the Protective Order. 11 7.2 12 Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted in writing by the Disclosure of Protected Material 13 Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 14 “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON” only 15 to the following persons or entities: 16 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as 17 employees of said Outside Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the 18 information for this litigation; 19 20 (b) the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; 21 (c) the Judge, the Court, and its personnel; 22 (d) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and 23 24 25 Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; (e) the author or recipient of the document or the original source of the information. 26 7.3 27 Documents containing Protected Material shall not be filed with the Court 28 The Filing of Protected Material with the Court absent: (a) consent from the Designating Party; or (b) the issuance of a sealing order 8 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 from the Court addressing such privileged and/or confidential information. If the 2 Designating Party does not consent, the Party seeking to file documents containing 3 Protected Material with the Court shall file a motion or an application for an order 4 sealing the document, pursuant to this Court’s Civil Local Rule L.R. 79-5, including 5 the procedures described in the Court’s Guide to electronically Filing Under-Seal 6 Documents in Civil Cases, available on the Court’s website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. 7 8. 8 9 UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL. 8.1 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under 10 the Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the 11 Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all 12 copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom 13 unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of the Protective Order, and (d) 14 request such person or persons to execute an acknowledgment and agreement to be 15 bound by the Protective Order. 16 9. 17 PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION. If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that 18 19 compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “JOINT 20 ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON” that Party 21 must: 22 23 24 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the party, who caused the subpoena or order, to 25 issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or 26 order is subject to the Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of the 27 Protective Order; and 28 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued 9 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx) 1 by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. 2 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order in such other litigation, 3 the Party served with the subpoena or court order in that litigation shall not produce 4 any information designated in this action as “JOINT ATTORNEY CLIENT 5 PRIVILEGE BETWEEN BIC AND DISMON” before a determination by the court 6 from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the 7 Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and 8 expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material – and nothing in 9 these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party 10 in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 11 10. MISCELLANEOUS 12 10.1 Right to Further Relief 13 Nothing in the Protective Order abridges the right of any person to seek its 14 modification by the Court in the future. 15 10.2 Right to Assert Other Objections 16 By entering in to the Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise 17 would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground 18 not addressed in the Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object 19 on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by the Protective 20 Order. 21 22 Dated: May 16, 2016 /S/ Frederick F. Mumm Honorable Frederick F. Mumm United States District Court 23 24 25 26 197125.doc 27 28 10 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01539-TJH (FFMx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?