Anthony Soto v. Rust-Oleum Corporation et al

Filing 37

ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu: It is ORDERED that the Stipulation 36 , is approved and the entire action entitled Anthony Soto v. Rust-Oleum Corporation, et al, Case No. 2:15-cv-01891, and each claim asserte d therein, is dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action to enforce, if necessary, the provisions of the confidential settlement agreement, the stipulated dismissal, and the Stipulation Dismissing the Entire Action with Prejudice. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

JS-6
1 KAREN M. SULLIVAN, State Bar No. 223430
[e-mail]
2 SADAF A. NEJAT, State Bar No. 280973
[e-mail]
3 WFBM, LLP
One City Boulevard West, Fifth Floor
4 Orange, California 92868-3677
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 Attorneys for Defendants
RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION and
7 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

10

ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868-3677

TEL [phone] • FAX [phone]

Walsworth

ONE CITY BOULEVARD WEST, FIFTH FLOOR

11 ANTHONY SOTO, an individual,
Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. CV 15-1891-GW(JCx)
ORDER DISMISSING THE
ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

v.

14 RUST-OLEUM CORPORATION, an
Illinois corporation; LOWE'S HOME
15 CENTERS, LLC, a North Carolina
limited liability company; and DOES 116 50, inclusive,
17
18

Defendants.

[Filed concurrently with the Stipulation
Dismissing the Entire Action with
Prejudice]
Hon.
Dept.

George H. Wu
10

Notice of Removal: March 13, 2015
Trial Date: February 2, 2016

19
20
21
22

ORDER

23
24

Having reviewed the joint Stipulation Dismissing the Entire Action with

25 Prejudice, and good cause appearing, it is ordered that that stipulation is approved
26 and the entire action entitled Anthony Soto v. Rust-Oleum Corporation, et al, Case
27 No. 2:15-cv-01891, and each claim asserted therein, is dismissed with prejudice.
28 The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action to enforce, if necessary, the
3307329.1
3536-3.3685

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1 provisions of the confidential settlement agreement, the stipulated dismissal, and the
2 Stipulation Dismissing the Entire Action with Prejudice.
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED
5
6 DATED: September 23, 2015
7
8
9

HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10

ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868-3677

TEL [phone] • FAX [phone]

Walsworth

ONE CITY BOULEVARD WEST, FIFTH FLOOR

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3307329.1
3536-3.3685

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this
action. I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. My business
4 address is One City Boulevard West, Fifth Floor, Orange, CA 92868-3677.
3

On September 23, 2015, I served true copies of the following document(s)
described as ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH
6 PREJUDICE on the interested parties in this action as follows:
5

7
BY CM/ECF NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING: I electronically filed
the document(s) with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system.
9 Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the
CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are not registered CM/ECF users will
10 be served by mail or by other means permitted by the court rules.
8

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct and that I am employed in the office
12 of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92868-3677

TEL [phone] • FAX [phone]

Walsworth

ONE CITY BOULEVARD WEST, FIFTH FLOOR

11

13

Executed on September 23, 2015, at Orange, California.

14
15
16

Cherri Grant

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3307329.1
3536-3.3685

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING THE ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE