Phillips 66 Company vs. T.M. B. Enterprises Inc et al
Filing
108
FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST GUARANTOR THOMAS HELO by Judge George H. Wu, 105 Phillips 66 Company is owed the amount of $285,025.89 by Thomas Helo; 2. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to prejudgment interest against Thomas Helo at the rate of 036;47.95 per day from March 28, 2012 to May 3, 2016, in the amount of $71,779.28; 3. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to additional prejudgment interest against Thomas Helo at the rate of $47.95 per day from May 4, 2016 to the day befor e the date of this judgment; 4. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to post-judgment interest against Thomas Helo from the date of this judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1961; 5. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to reasonable attorneys fe es against Thomas Helo in the amount of $168,401.95 and litigation expenses against Thomas Helo in the amount of $1,178.65; and 6. Phillips 66 Company is entitled to costs of court. 7. Phillips 66 is entitled to all writs and process necessary to enforce andcollect this judgment. 8. This judgment finally disposes of all remaining parties and all remaining claims, and is appealable. (pj)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Darin L. Brooks
Texas State Bar No. 00796252
dbrooks@grayreed.com
Brian E. Waters
Texas State Bar No. 24078035
bwaters@grayreed.com
GRAY REED & MCGRAW, P.C.
1300 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2000
Houston, Texas 77056
Phone:
(713) 986-7000
Facsimile: (713) 986-7100
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Phillips 66 Company
8
9
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
T.M.B. ENTERPRISES, INC.,
THOMAS HELO AND SUZANNE
HELO,
Defendants.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 15-1962-GW(JPRx)
FINAL JUDGMENT
AGAINST GUARANTOR
THOMAS HELO
20
21
22
Before the Court is Plaintiff Phillips 66 Company’s Motion for Final
23
Summary Judgment against Thomas Helo. After consideration of the papers in
24
support of and in opposition to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the
25
pleadings and papers on file, and any arguments of counsel and pro se defendant
26
Thomas Helo, the Court orders summary judgment in favor of Phillips 66
27
Company as follows:
28
-1FINAL JUDGMENT 2:15-CV-01962-GW-JPR
1
1.
Helo;
2
3
Phillips 66 Company is owed the amount of $285,025.89 by Thomas
2.
Phillips 66 Company is entitled to prejudgment interest against Thomas
4
Helo at the rate of $47.95 per day from March 28, 2012 to May 3, 2016,
5
in the amount of $71,779.28;
6
3.
Phillips 66 Company is entitled to additional prejudgment interest
7
against Thomas Helo at the rate of $47.95 per day from May 4, 2016 to
8
the day before the date of this judgment;
9
4.
Phillips 66 Company is entitled to post-judgment interest against
10
Thomas Helo from the date of this judgment in accordance with 28
11
U.S.C. § 1961;
12
5.
Phillips 66 Company is entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees against
13
Thomas Helo in the amount of $168,401.95 and litigation expenses
14
against Thomas Helo in the amount of $1,178.65; and
15
6.
Phillips 66 Company is entitled to costs of court.
16
7.
Phillips 66 is entitled to all writs and process necessary to enforce and
collect this judgment.
17
18
19
8.
This judgment finally disposes of all remaining parties and all
remaining claims, and is appealable.
20
21
Dated: June 7, 2016
22
23
24
HON. GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
-2FINAL JUDGMENT 2:15-CV-01962-GW-JPR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?