Lois Jean Huffman v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Filing 26

ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, AND FOR COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 25 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. **Note: Changes Made by the Court.** IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $6,900.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the stipulation. Plaintiff's Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (docket no. 21), filed on January 11, 2016, is denied as moot. (es)

Download PDF
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division ESTHER KIM, CSBN 278995 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8922 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Esther.H.Kim@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOIS JEAN HUFFMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) Acting Commissioner of Social ) Security, ) ) Defendant. __________________________ _____ ) CASE NO. 2:15-02210-PLA ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, AND FOR COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 1 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to 2 the Equal Access to Justice Act, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the 3 amount of $6,900.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the 4 terms of the stipulation. Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal 5 Access to Justice Act (docket no. 21), filed on January 11, 2016, is denied as moot. 6 7 8 9 10 DATE: February 3, 2016 ____________________________________ THE HON. PAUL L. ABRAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?