Lois Jean Huffman v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
26
ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, AND FOR COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 25 by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. **Note: Changes Made by the Court.** IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $6,900.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the terms of the stipulation. Plaintiff's Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (docket no. 21), filed on January 11, 2016, is denied as moot. (es)
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
ESTHER KIM, CSBN 278995
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8922
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Esther.H.Kim@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
LOIS JEAN HUFFMAN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
)
Acting Commissioner of Social
)
Security,
)
)
Defendant.
__________________________ _____ )
CASE NO. 2:15-02210-PLA
ORDER FOR THE
AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, AND
FOR COSTS PURSUANT TO
28 U.S.C. § 1920
1
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award of Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to
2
the Equal Access to Justice Act, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the
3
amount of $6,900.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, be awarded subject to the
4
terms of the stipulation. Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal
5
Access to Justice Act (docket no. 21), filed on January 11, 2016, is denied as moot.
6
7
8
9
10
DATE: February 3, 2016
____________________________________
THE HON. PAUL L. ABRAMS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?