R Mora et al v US Bank et al

Filing 63

JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Courts order granted Plaintiffs ROBERT MORA and LILLIAN MORA up to and including November 16, 2015 to file a second amended complaint. Id. Plaintiffs did not file a second amendedcomplaint. IT IS THEREFORE OR DERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that thisaction is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action in this action, and that Plaintiffs take nothing by way of their claims.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6

LOCKE LORD LLP
Regina J. McClendon (SBN 184669)
[e-mail]
Lindsey E. Kress (SBN 278213)
[e-mail]
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

JS-6

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant
U.S. Bank National Association

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION

Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100
San Francisco, CA 94104

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

) CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-02436-DDP-AJWx
)
) JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
)
)
)
vs.
)
)
US BANK, aka, US BANK, N.A., aka, US )
) Complaint Filed: April 3, 2015
BANK HOME MORTGAGE, aka US
)
BANK, N.A., INC., DOES 1-10,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
R. MORA & L. MORA,

22
23

On November 2, 2015, this Court entered an order granting the motion to

24

dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint for failure to state a claim filed by

25

defendant U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (erroneously sued as US

26

BANK, aka, US BANK, N.A., US BANK HOME MORTGAGE, aka US BANK,

27

N.A., INC.) (“Defendant”). Dkt. 57. The Court’s order granted Plaintiffs ROBERT

28

MORA and LILLIAN MORA (“Plaintiffs”) up to and including November 16, 2015
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Mora,et al. v. US Bank et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-02436-DDP-AJWx

1

to file a second amended complaint. Id. Plaintiffs did not file a second amended

2

complaint.

3

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this

4

action is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ordered that judgment be entered in

5

favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action in this

6

action, and that Plaintiffs take nothing by way of their claims.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10

Dated: December 02, 2015
Hon. Dean D. Pregerson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11

Locke Lord LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100
San Francisco, CA 94104

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Mora,et al. v. US Bank et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-02436-DDP-AJWx