Jorge Ernesto Brizuela et al v. Western Progressive LLC et al

Filing 54

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt Related to: Order on Motion to Strike, Order on Motion to Dismiss Case 52 . The above-entitled action be, and hereby is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

12
13
14

Case No.:
LA CV15-02476-JAK (Ex)

JORGE ERNESTO BRIZUELA;
DINORAH ALFARO,

15

Plaintiffs,

16
17

JUDGMENT

vs.

JS-6

18
19
20
21
22

WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC;
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP;
ROBIN P. WRIGHT, ESQ., SBN
150984; BRADFORD E. KLEIN, ESQ.,
SBN 259252; RICHARD J. LEE, ESQ.,
SBN 268713; and/or JOHN DOES 1-10,

23
24

Defendants.

25
26
27

On May 11, 2016, the Court granted Defendants WESTERN
PROGRESSIVE, LLC; WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP; ROBIN P. WRIGHT,

28

ESQ., SBN 150984; BRADFORD E. KLEIN, ESQ., SBN 259252; and RICHARD
1

JUDGMENT

1
2

J. LEE, ESQ., SBN 268713 (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiffs JORGE ERNESTO BRIZUELA (“Brizuela”) and DINORAH ALFARO

3
4
5

(“Borrower” or “Alfaro”) (“Plaintiffs”) First Amended Complaint with prejudice.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that

6
7

the above-entitled action be, and hereby is dismissed, with prejudice, as to

8

Defendants, and that a Judgment of Dismissal with prejudice be entered in favor of

9
10
11
12

Defendants and against Plaintiffs. Based on said judgment, Plaintiffs shall take
nothing by way of the Complaint against Defendants. Defendants are the
prevailing parties in this matter.

13
14
15
16
17

Dated: June 1, 2016

___________________________________
Hon. John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

JUDGMENT