Eyon Neal Christmas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 52

JUDGMENT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment on the merits is hereby entered in favor of Defendant on all counts, that Plaintiff Eyon Neal Christmas shall take nothing by this action, and that Plainti ff's First Amended Complaint shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice for the reasons set forth in this Court's 11/19/2015, Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 50 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

WESTERN DIVISION

14
15
16

EYON NEAL CHRISTMAS, on behalf
of himself and all other similarly
situated individuals,

17

Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Case No. 2:15-cv-02612 AB
(PLAx)
JUDGMENT

v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
COMPANY, a Delaware corporation;
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, a
Utah corporation; GEORGE R.
DAVIS, an individual; ZACHARY J.
PITTMAN, an individual, JOHN E.
YETTAW, an individual; KENNETH
R. FAIR, an individual; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
-1-

JUDGMENT
Case No. . 2:15-cv-02612 AB (PLAx)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Defendant”) has moved for
judgment on the pleadings in the above-captioned matter pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 12(c), seeking to dismiss with prejudice the First Amended
Complaint of Plaintiff Eyon Neal Christmas. 1 The arguments and evidence
presented having been fully considered, the issues having been heard and a decision
having been rendered on November 19, 2015, granting Defendant’s motion [see
Docket Entry No. 50],
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT
judgment on the merits is hereby entered in favor of Defendant on all counts, that
Plaintiff Eyon Neal Christmas shall take nothing by this action, and that Plaintiff’s
First Amended Complaint shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice for the
reasons set forth in this Court’s November 19, 2015, Order Granting Defendant’s
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike
[Docket Entry No. 50].

15
16
17

Dated: November 24, 2015
The Honorable André Birotte Jr.
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
1

28

All other named defendants in this action were previously dismissed for the
reasons stated in this Court’s Order of October 7, 2015 [Docket Entry No. 38].
-2-

JUDGMENT
Case No. . 2:15-cv-02612 AB (PLAx)