Robert James et al v. Otis Jackson, Jr. et al

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Upon Stipulation 26 , the Court orders as follows: A Settlement Agreement has been reached which resolves all matters between the parties arising out of the claims asserted in the Complaint. The Notice of Dismissal 23 voluntarily dismissing Defendants Apple Inc., Amazon.com, LLC, and Amazon.com, Inc. without prejudice is vacated. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants. Each side is to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5

ALLEN HYMAN, ESQ. (CBN: 73371)
LAW OFFICES OF ALLEN HYMAN
10737 Riverside Drive
North Hollywood, California 91602
P: [phone] or [phone]
F: [phone]
E: [e-mail]

FILED
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

June 30, 2015
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PG

BY: ___________________ DEPUTY

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ROBERT JAMES and TAPPAN ZEE RECORDS, INC.

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11
12

ROBERT JAMES, an individual; and CASE NO. 2:15-cv-02698-SVW-VBK
TAPPAN ZEE RECORDS, INC., a
XXXXXXXXXXX
(PROPOSED) ORDER
Michigan Corporation,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

v.
OTIS JACKSON, JR., an individual;
KEITH ROMAN GREIGO, an
individual; STONES THROW
RECORDS, LLC, a California
Limited Liability Company; APPLE
INC., a California Corporation;
AMAZON.COM, LLC, a Delaware
Limited Liability Company;
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
Corporation,

20

Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26

Upon the parties’ stipulation, by and through their counsel, the Court finds
and orders as follows:
1.

A Settlement Agreement has been reached which resolves all matters

between the parties arising out of the claims asserted in the Complaint.
2.

The Notice of Dismissal (Dkt. 23) voluntarily dismissing Defendants

27

Apple Inc., Amazon.com, LLC, and Amazon.com, Inc. without prejudice is

28

vacated.
-1(PROPOSED) ORDER

1

3.

The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants.

2

4.

Each side is to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.

3

5.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
The Court retains jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the terms of the

4

Settlement Agreement between the parties.

5
6
7
8

Dated:

6/30/15

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2(PROPOSED) ORDER