Doc's Dream, LLC v. Dolores Press, Inc. et al

Filing 136

JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and this Judgment are adjudicated on the merits in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs. Defendants' Counterclaims and Third Party Claims were previously dismissed and such dismissal is confirmed and made a part of this Judgment. Defendants shall file a separate motion for attorneys' fees. See document for further details. (gk)

1 Kevin J. Leichter, Esq. (SBN 154143)

Andrew E. Hewitt, Esq. (SBN 314504)

2 THE LEICHTER FIRM, APC

10203 Santa Monica Boulevard

3 Fourth Floor

NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT

Los Angeles, California 90067
4 Tel: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
5 Email: [e-mail]
6 Mark S. Lee, Esq. (SBN 094103)

MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP

7 11355 West Olympic Boulevard

Los Angeles, CA 90064-1614

8 Telephone: [phone]

Facsimile: [phone]

9 Email: [e-mail]

10 Attorneys for Defendants and

Counterclaim and Third-Party Claim Plaintiffs

11 DOLORES PRESS, INC. and MELISSA SCOTT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOC’S DREAM, LLC;

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-02857-R(PLA)

Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant

(Hon. Manuel Real, Ctrm. 880)
JUDGMENT

vs.
DOLORES PRESS, INC., MELISSA
SCOTT;
Defendants and
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DOLORES PRESS, INC., MELISSA
SCOTT;
Third Party Plaintiffs,
vs.
PATRICK ROBINSON, TRUTH
SEEKERS, INC., BOBBI JONES,
DOES 1-10;
Third Party Defendants.
JUDGMENT

1

The Court having entered, on January 31, 2018 its Order Granting Summary

2 Judgment (Doc. No. 132), in favor of Defendants Dolores Press, Inc. (“Dolores
3 Press”) and Pastor Melissa Scott (“Pastor Scott”) (collectively referred to herein as
4 the “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 76) and against
5 Plaintiff Doc’s Dream, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”), and GOOD CAUSE appearing,
6

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

7

1.

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (the “FAC”) and its sole claim for

8 relief therein, for a declaration regarding copyright ownership of certain works of
9 authorship as specified in Exhibit A to Plaintiff’s FAC and to this Judgment (the
10 “Works”) under the Declaratory Judgment Act (the “Act”) are adjudicated on the
11 merits in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs.
12

2.

Defendants’ Counterclaims and Third Party Claims were previously

13 dismissed and such dismissal is confirmed and made a part of this Judgment.
14

3.

Defendants shall file a separate motion for attorneys’ fees no longer

15 than five pages long, excluding exhibits.
16
17 Dated: March 28, 2018
18

By: ____________________________
The Honorable Manuel L. Real
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

JUDGMENT