Sandra Gabriel et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Filing
122
REDACTED ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE MINORS' COMPROMISE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
) Case No. 2:15−cv−03118 JAK(JEMx)
)
and as guardian ad litem for M.G.,
)
J.G., B.G., and A.G; M.G., a minor by ) REDACTED ORDER AND JUDGMENT
)
and through her guardian ad litem
) GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE
Sandra Gabriel; J.G., a minor by and ) MINORS’ COMPROMISE
through his guardian ad litem Sandra )
Gabriel; B.G., a minor by and through ) JS-6
)
her guardian ad litem Sandra Gabriel; )
and A.G. a minor by and through his )
)
guardian ad litem Sandra Gabriel
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a
)
)
public entity; JESSICA PEREZ
)
MARTINEZ, an individual; NORA
)
SALINAS, an individual; ANGELICA )
MIRANDA, an individual; CRISTINA )
)
PAREDES, an individual;
)
MELANDIE SMITH-AUSTIN, an
)
individual; PHILLIP BROWNING an )
)
individual; MERTIS BROWN, an
)
individual; and DOES 1 through 50; )
)
Defendants.
12 SANDRA GABRIEL, an individual
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING APPROVAL OF MINORS’ COMPROMISE
1
2
3
4
5
This Court, having considered the Petition for an Order Approving Minors’
6 Compromise of Pending Action (the “Petition”), filed by Plaintiffs A.G., B.G., J.G., and
7 M.G., by and through their mother and guardian ad litem, Sandra Gabriel, on April 3,
8 2017 (Dkt. 115.), and finding GOOD CAUSE,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
10
1.
The Petition is GRANTED.
11
2.
The settlement of minors A.G., B.G., J.G., and M.G. in the total amount of
12 $140,000.00, is APPROVED as fair and reasonable.
13
3.
The division of the settlement of $23,152.34 for Plaintiff Anthony Araiza
14 (A.G.), an eleven year-old male, D.O.B. October 9, 2005 and $11,666.00 in attorneys’
15 fees is also approved as fair and reasonable, and the attorneys’ fees in this matter are
16 accordingly APPROVED.
17
4.
The division of the settlement of $23,152.34 for Plaintiff Breanna Saldana
18 (B.G.), a nine year-old female, D.O.B. October 28, 2008, and $11,666.00 in attorneys’
19 fees is also approved as fair and reasonable, and the attorneys’ fees in this matter are
20 accordingly APPROVED.
21
5.
The division of the settlement of $23,152.34 for Plaintiff Josiahh Ledesma
22 (J.G.), a five year-old male, D.O.B. April 8, 2011 and $11,666.00 in attorneys’ fees is
23 also approved as fair and reasonable, and the attorneys’ fees in this matter are
24
25
26
27
28
accordingly APPROVED.
6.
The division of the settlement of $23,152.34 for Plaintiff Mayya Ledesma
(M.G.), a four year-old male, D.O.B. April 25, 2013 and $11,666.00 in attorneys’ fees is
also approved as fair and reasonable, and the attorneys’ fees in this matter are
accordingly APPROVED.
7.
The County of Los Angeles will issue a check to the Law Office of L.
2
ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING APPROVAL OF MINORS’ COMPROMISE
1 Wallace Pate, Attorney Trust Account in the amount of $140,000. The amount
2 attributable to each minor Plaintiff, A.G., B.G., J.G., and M.G., shall be placed into a
3 blocked account at Chase Bank located at 251 East Compton Blvd, Compton, CA 90220,
4 telephone: (562) 265-1308 (“Chase Bank”).
5
8.
The blocked accounts at Chase Bank in each minor Plaintiff’s name shall be
6 such that the funds cannot be withdrawn without further order of this Court before the
7 minors reach majority.
8
9.
Plaintiffs’ counsel must deliver to Chase Bank at the time of deposit of the
9 checks a copy of this Order and Judgment.
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12 DATED: May 9, 2017
_______________________________
John A. Kronstadt
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING APPROVAL OF MINORS’ COMPROMISE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?