Hugo Chavarria v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 22

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants shall have a judgment of dismissal entered in their favor and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff's entire action is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants. Plaintiff shall take nothing against Defendants. (lom)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 Hugo Chavarria, a male individual, 12 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:15-cv-03403 BRO (ASx) Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell Ctrm. 14 – Spring St. vs. JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., d/b/a AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY, a 15 National Bank Association; et al. Action Filed: May 6, 2015 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1572/4669690.1 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 1 On August 12, 2015, the Court issued an order (the “Court Order,” see ECF 2 No. 19) granting the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants WELLS FARGO 3 BANK, N.A.; THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, fka The Bank of New York 4 as Successor in interest to JP Morgan Chase Bank NA as Trustee for Structured 5 Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc. Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2004-6, Mortgage 6 Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-6, and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC 7 REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (collectively “Defendants”). 8 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, 9 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants shall have 10 a judgment of dismissal entered in their favor and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff’s entire 11 action is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendants. Plaintiff shall take nothing 12 against Defendants. 13 14 15 DATED: August 17, 2015 16 17 _________________________________ BEVERLY REID O’CONNELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1572/4669690.1 2 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?