Aaron Lofist et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al

Filing 63

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 62 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action against Defendants, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BRITTANY ELENES, YUDIT MARTINEZ, KEVAN BEARD, ABEL CEPEIDA, BRANDON ROACH, WILLIAM HINES and ERICK SANDOVAL, is dismissed, with prejudice in its entirety. Each party to bear their own costs and fees. This dismissal does not constitute an adjudication on the merits. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AARON LOFIST and DEIRDRE
MEHMOOD

12
13
14
15
16

CASE NO.: CV15-03538 AB (GJSx)
Hon. Andre Birotte Jr.,- Ctrm. 4, 2nd Fl.
Hon. Mag. Gail J. Standish – Ctrm. 640, 6th Fl.

Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive.

[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
ENTIRE ACTION

Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Based on the stipulation of the parties and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action against
Defendants, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, BRITTANY ELENES, YUDIT
MARTINEZ, KEVAN BEARD, ABEL CEPEIDA, BRANDON ROACH,
WILLIAM HINES and ERICK SANDOVAL, is dismissed, with prejudice in its
entirety. Each party to bear their own costs and fees. This dismissal does not constitute
an adjudication on the merits.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

DATED: August 1, 2017

HONORABLE ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1