Robin Nash v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
27
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation to Remand") lodged concurrently with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
7
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
LEON W. WEIDMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
MICHAEL K. MARRIOTT, CSBN 280890
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94105-1545
Telephone: (415) 977-8985
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: Michael.Marriott@ssa.gov
8
Attorneys for Defendant
1
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
WESTERN DIVISION
12
13
ROBIN NASH,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
17
18
19
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner
of Social Security,
20
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
)
) Case No. 2:15-cv-03663-JC
)
) JUDGMENT OF REMAND
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand
Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment
(“Stipulation to Remand”) lodged concurrently with the lodging of the within
Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
//
//
28
1
1
DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of
2
Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand.
3
4
5
6
DATED:
November 13, 2015
/s/
HONORABLE JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?