Edmund William Sierra v. Dept of Family and Children Services et al

Filing 36

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow for Report and Recommendation 32 (mt)

Download PDF
O 1 2 3 10/27/2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDMUND WILLIAM SIERRA, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. 14 DEPT. of FAMILY and CHILDREN SERVICES, et al., 15 16 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 15-03691-MMM (KES) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all 18 the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the 19 20 United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo 21 review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections 22 have been made. The Court hereby approves and accepts the findings, 23 conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. 24 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) Plaintiff’s claims against 25 26 Defendants Yap and Smeal are dismissed without leave to amend and with 27 prejudice; and (2) The remainder of the Complaint is dismissed with leave to 28 1 1 amend, but only in the following limited manner: 2 (a) The First Amended Complaint shall not exceed 50 pages. Plaintiff shall 3 4 focus his allegations on facts (e.g., who, what, where, when and how), clearly 5 identifying the wrongful acts/omissions allegedly committed by each named 6 Defendant. Plaintiff shall identify those Defendants with whom he personally 7 8 interacted and describe the interactions giving rise to his claims. Plaintiff shall 9 identify those Defendants with whom he never interacted, but whom he alleges 10 are nevertheless liable based on their actions undertaken in a supervisory or 11 12 policy-making role; (b) Exhibits attached to the First Amended Complaint shall be redacted to 13 14 protect sensitive information consistent with L.R. 5.2-1; 15 (c) The First Amended Complaint shall not include claims based on 16 17 allegedly wrongful acts involving K.S.; 18 (d) The First Amended Complaint shall not include claims based on 19 20 allegedly wrongful acts that occurred and were known to Plaintiff before March 12, 21 2013; 22 23 24 (e) Consistent with the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the First Amended Complaint shall not include claims based on allegations that any orders or 25 findings by the state juvenile court (such as the determination to declare K.S., C.S. 26 and E.S. dependents of the court) were erroneous and thus violated Plaintiff’s 27 constitutional rights; 28 2 1 2 3 (f) The First Amended Complaint shall not pray for punitive damages as a remedy against the County or any County employees sued in their official 4 capacity; and 5 6 7 (g) Any allegation that Plaintiff suffered harm caused by a County policy, custom, or practice shall describe the content of the challenged policy, custom, or 8 practice. Similarly, any allegation that Plaintiff suffered harm caused by a lack of 9 training shall describe what training was lacking. 10 11 If Plaintiff wishes to pursue the above-noted claims, Plaintiff’s First 12 Amended Complaint shall be due within thirty (30) days from the date of entry 13 1 14 of this. 15 DATED: October 26, 2015 16 ______________________________ MARGARET M. MORROW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 If Plaintiff chooses to file a First Amended Complaint, it should bear the docket number assigned in this case, be labeled “First Amended Complaint,” and be complete in and of itself without reference to the original Complaint or any other pleading or document. Plaintiff may serve the First Amended Complaint on all Defendants who have appeared by serving their counsel of record. Should he elect to pursue claims against Defendant Karolin Ferrier, Plaintiff will need to serve the First Amended Complaint on Defendant Ferrier in a manner that satisfies Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and then file a proof of service declaration. 1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?