Mirko Hoffman v. County of Los Angeles et al
Filing
158
JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Accordingly, IT IS ADJUDGED as follows: 1. As to plaintiff's claim of unreasonable search against Rivera, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that Rivera did not conduc t an unreasonable search. 2. As to plaintiff's claim of unlawful arrest against Rivera, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that Rivera effected an unlawful arrest. 3. As to plaintiff's claim of excess ive force against Rivera, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that Rivera did not use excessive force 4. As to plaintiff's claim for supervisory liability against Avola, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that Avola is not liable for the constitutional violation committed by Rivera.5. As to plaintiff 's prayer for compensatory damages, the jury rendered a verdict findingthat plaintiff shall recover one-hundr ed thousand dollars ($100,000.00) from Rivera in compensatory damages. 6. As to plaintiff's prayer for punitive damages against Rivera, the jury rendered a verdict finding that plaintiff shall recover nine thousand dollars ($9,000.00) from Rivera in punitive damages. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MIRKO HOFFMAN,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,
Defendants.
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 15-3724 FMO (ASx)
JUDGMENT
16
This action was tried by a jury in Courtroom 6D of the First Street Courthouse, United
17
States District Court for the Central District of California, the Honorable Fernando M. Olguin,
18
United States District Judge, presiding.
19
attorneys Tristan Pelayes and Jacob Menicucci. Defendants Ruben Rivera (“Rivera”) and
20
Maurizio Avola (“Avola”) appeared with attorneys Douglas Day and Harold Becks.
21
commenced on February 28, 2017, and the jury returned a unanimous verdict on March 3, 2017.
22
(See Dkt. 153, Special Verdict Form). Accordingly, IT IS ADJUDGED as follows:
Plaintiff Mirko Hoffman (“plaintiff”) appeared with
Trial
23
1. As to plaintiff’s claim of unreasonable search against Rivera, brought under 42 U.S.C.
24
§ 1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that Rivera did not conduct an unreasonable search.
25
2. As to plaintiff’s claim of unlawful arrest against Rivera, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
26
27
28
the jury rendered a verdict finding that Rivera effected an unlawful arrest.
3. As to plaintiff’s claim of excessive force against Rivera, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
the jury rendered a verdict finding that Rivera did not use excessive force.
1
4. As to plaintiff’s claim for supervisory liability against Avola, brought under 42 U.S.C. §
2
1983, the jury rendered a verdict finding that Avola is not liable for the constitutional violation
3
committed by Rivera.
4
5. As to plaintiff’s prayer for compensatory damages, the jury rendered a verdict finding
5
that plaintiff shall recover one-hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) from Rivera in
6
compensatory damages.
7
6. As to plaintiff’s prayer for punitive damages against Rivera, the jury rendered a verdict
8
finding that plaintiff shall recover nine thousand dollars ($9,000.00) from Rivera in punitive
9
damages.
10
Dated this 6th day of March, 2017.
11
12
/s/
Fernando M. Olguin
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?