Talmadge Adib Talib v. Juan Guerrero et al
Filing
68
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, by Judge John A. Kronstadt 61 . Granting in Part Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss and Plaintiff's state-law claims are dismissed without leave to amend 36 . See Order for more information. (twdb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
TALMADGE ADIB TALIB,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
JUAN GUERRERO et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
ROLAND LEROY REESE-BEY,
18
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
21
JUAN GUERRERO et al.,
Defendants.
22
23
ROMANÁH HOLMES-BEY,
24
Plaintiff,
25
v.
26
27
28
JUAN GUERRERO et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 15-3825-JAK (DFM)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 15-3833-JAK (DFM)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 15-4822-JAK (DFM)
Order Accepting Report and
Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge
Order Accepting Report and
Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge
Order Accepting Report and
Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Third
1
2
Amended Complaints, the records on file, and the Report and
3
Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. The Court
4
has also reviewed Plaintiffs’ written objections to the Report and
5
Recommendation and made a de novo determination of those portions of the
6
Report and Recommendation to which objections are made.
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
8
1.
The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted.
9
2.
Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted in part and Plaintiff’s
10
state-law claims are dismissed without leave to amend.
3.
11
The remaining Defendants are ordered to file Answers to the
12
remaining portions of the Third Amended Complaints within fourteen (14)
13
days.
14
15
Dated: October 25, 2017
______________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?