Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Advanced Alarm, Inc. et al

Filing 13

JUDGMENT 12 by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Nation al Electrical Benefit Fund, National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, Administrative Maintenance Fund, and Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, shall recov er, from Defendant Advanced Alarm, Inc., a California corporation, Defendant Ronald Perry George Jr., an individual, and Defendant Edward Gerard Corpus, an individual, jointly and severally, the principal amount of $37,509.55, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the rate of 8% per annum accruing from June 15, 2015, until the judgment is paid in full. (lom)

Download PDF
1 NO JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. 15-cv-03853 MMM (RAOx) TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA PENSION PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA HEALTH TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT TRUST FUND; TRUSTEES OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY ELECTRICAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL IBEW-NECA LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE, CONTRACT COMPLIANCE FUND, ADMINISTRATIVE MAINTENANCE FUND, and LOS ANGELES ELECTRICAL WORKERS CREDIT UNION, Plaintiffs, ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE MARGARET M. MORROW [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 24 vs. 25 26 27 ADVANCED ALARM, INC., a California corporation; RONALD PERRY GEORGE JR., an individual; and EDWARD GERARD CORPUS, an individual, 28 Defendants. 1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT.DOC 1 This action having been commenced on May 21, 2015, and the Court having 2 approved the stipulation for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Trustees of the 3 Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, et al., and against defendants, 4 Advanced Alarm, Inc., a California corporation, Ronald Perry George Jr., an 5 individual, and Edward Gerard Corpus, an individual, and for good cause shown, 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs, 7 Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the 8 Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles 9 County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern 10 California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the 11 National IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the 12 National Electrical Benefit Fund, National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the 13 Southern California IBEW-NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, 14 Administrative Maintenance Fund, and Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, 15 shall recover, from Defendant Advanced Alarm, Inc., a California corporation, 16 Defendant Ronald Perry George Jr., an individual, and Defendant Edward Gerard 17 Corpus, an individual, jointly and severally, the principal amount of $37,509.55, 18 together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the rate of 8% per annum 19 accruing from June 15, 2015, until the judgment is paid in full. 20 21 DATED: July 21, 2015 22 _______________________________________ Margaret M. Morrow UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?