Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Advanced Alarm, Inc. et al
Filing
13
JUDGMENT 12 by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the National IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the Nation al Electrical Benefit Fund, National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund, Administrative Maintenance Fund, and Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union, shall recov er, from Defendant Advanced Alarm, Inc., a California corporation, Defendant Ronald Perry George Jr., an individual, and Defendant Edward Gerard Corpus, an individual, jointly and severally, the principal amount of $37,509.55, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the rate of 8% per annum accruing from June 15, 2015, until the judgment is paid in full. (lom)
1
NO JS-6
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Case No. 15-cv-03853 MMM (RAOx)
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA PENSION
PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA HEALTH TRUST FUND,
TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA IBEW-NECA
SUPPLEMENTAL UNEMPLOYMENT
BENEFIT TRUST FUND; TRUSTEES
OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY
ELECTRICAL EDUCATION AND
TRAINING TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES
OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL
BENEFIT FUND, TRUSTEES OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IBEWNECA LABOR-MANAGEMENT
COOPERATION COMMITTEE,
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL
IBEW-NECA LABOR-MANAGEMENT
COOPERATION COMMITTEE,
CONTRACT COMPLIANCE FUND,
ADMINISTRATIVE MAINTENANCE
FUND, and LOS ANGELES
ELECTRICAL WORKERS CREDIT
UNION,
Plaintiffs,
ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE
MARGARET M. MORROW
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
24
vs.
25
26
27
ADVANCED ALARM, INC., a
California corporation; RONALD
PERRY GEORGE JR., an individual; and
EDWARD GERARD CORPUS, an
individual,
28
Defendants.
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT.DOC
1
This action having been commenced on May 21, 2015, and the Court having
2
approved the stipulation for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Trustees of the
3
Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, et al., and against defendants,
4
Advanced Alarm, Inc., a California corporation, Ronald Perry George Jr., an
5
individual, and Edward Gerard Corpus, an individual, and for good cause shown,
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs,
7
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the
8
Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund, Trustees of the Los Angeles
9
County Electrical Educational and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern
10
California IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the
11
National IBEW-NECA Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, Trustees of the
12
National Electrical Benefit Fund, National Electrical Industry Fund, Trustees of the
13
Southern California IBEW-NECA Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Trust Fund,
14
Administrative Maintenance Fund, and Los Angeles Electrical Workers Credit Union,
15
shall recover, from Defendant Advanced Alarm, Inc., a California corporation,
16
Defendant Ronald Perry George Jr., an individual, and Defendant Edward Gerard
17
Corpus, an individual, jointly and severally, the principal amount of $37,509.55,
18
together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the rate of 8% per annum
19
accruing from June 15, 2015, until the judgment is paid in full.
20
21
DATED: July 21, 2015
22
_______________________________________
Margaret M. Morrow
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT.DOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?