Vinod Chhabra v. DeVry University, Inc., et al

Filing 53

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson:On July 25, 2016, the Court DISMISSED the case with PREJUDICE based on Plaintiffs failure to appear and prosecute the action. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDICATED that judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants DeVry University, Inc. (also erroneously sued as DeVry University), DeVry, Inc. (nka DeVry Education Group, Inc.), Brian Porter, Scott Sand, and Kelli Spence. Defendants shall be awarded their costs of suit herein. (lc)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VINOD CHHABRA,
v.

Case No. 2:15-cv-03857-DDP-FFM

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEVRY UNIVERSITY, INC., an Illinois DEFENDANTS
corporation registered in the State of
California; DEVRY UNIVERSITY, an
entity of unknown capacity; DEVRY,
INC., a Delaware corporation registered in
the State of California; SCOTT SAND, an
individual; KELLI SPENCE, an
individual; BRIAN PORTER, an
individual; and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:15-cv-03857-DDP-FFM
28405669v.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS

1
2
3

On July 25, 2016, the Court DISMISSED the case with PREJUDICE based on
Plaintiff’s failure to appear and prosecute the action.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDICATED that judgment shall be

4

entered in favor of Defendants DeVry University, Inc. (also erroneously sued as DeVry

5

University), DeVry, Inc. (nka DeVry Education Group, Inc.), Brian Porter, Scott Sand,

6

and Kelli Spence. Defendants shall be awarded their costs of suit herein.

7

JUDGMENT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10

DATED: August 10, 2016

11
12

____________________________________
HONORABLE Dean D. Pregerson
United States District Judge
U.S. District Court
for the Central District of California

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
Case No. 2:15-cv-03857-DDP-FFM
28405669v.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS