United States of America v. City of Los Angeles, et al.

Filing 63

ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 62 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No.: CV 15-3919 DMG (JPRx) v. ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ACTION [62] CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER, et al., Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 1 Plaintiff United States of America, Defendants City of Los Angeles, acting by and 2 through the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Kenneth Dinsmoor, Earl 3 Foust, Jesus Del Villar, and Jeff Follin, and Third-Party Defendant Impact Power, Inc., 4 filed a Stipulation to Dismiss Action based on the Settlement Agreement reached 5 between the United States and Defendant City of Los Angeles, acting by and through the 6 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and the settlement agreement reached 7 between the City of Los Angeles, acting by and through the Los Angeles Department of 8 Water and Power and Impact Power, Inc. Therefore, good cause appearing, 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the above-captioned action is dismissed with 10 prejudice in its entirety, with each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs. All 11 scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. 12 13 14 DATED: April 17, 2017 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?