Vincent Bonilla v. City of Los Angeles

Filing 175

JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Consistent with the jury's verdict (Dkt. Nos. 168), judgment is entered in favor of Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES, and against Plaintiff VINCENT B0NILLA. Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES, as the prevailing party, shall be entitled to recover their costs reasonably incurred in defense of this action pursuant to L.R. 54-1 and 54-2. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vv)

~— ~ /~
~--13

1

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
1 1 VINCENT BONILLA,

Case No.: CV 15-03932 CBM (SSx)

12

Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall; Courtroom 8B
Honorable Magistrate Judge: Suzanne H. Segal

Plaintiffs,

13 vs.
JUDGMENT

14
15
)
CITY OF LOS ANGELES,and
16 UNKNOWN OFFICERS 1 Through 50,)
)
17 Inclusive, In Their Individual
)
Capacities,
18
Defendant.
)
19
2
0
21

Consistent with the jury's verdict(Dkt. Nos. 168),judgment is entered in favor of

22 Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES,and against Plaintiff VINCENT B01~1ILLA.
23 Defendant CITY OF LOS ANGELES, as the prevailing party, shall be entitled to
recover their costs reasonably incurred in defense of this action pursuant to L.R. 54-1
25 and 54-2.
2
6
27 Dated: February ~.~, 2018.
28

~ <~_ —~~~~ ``-- ~-HONORABLE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE