Applied Lubrication Technology, Inc. v. Mighty Lube Systematic Lubrication, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 25 . IT IS HERBY ORDERED that: 1. All claims and counterclaims asserted in this action between Applied Lubrication and Mighty Lube, and between Applie d Lubrication and Martinez, are hereby dismissed with prejudice; 2. Applied Lubrication, Mighty Lube and Martinez shall each bear its or his own respective fees and costs incurred herein; and 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 APPLIED LUBRICATION

TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,
v.
MIGHTY LUBE SYSTEMATIC

14 LUBRICATION INC., MIGHTY LUBE

USA SALES, INC., and GIL

15 MARTINEZ, an individual,
16
17

Defendants,
__________________________________
MIGHTY LUBE SYSTEMATIC

18 LUBRICATION, INC., MIGHTY LUBE

USA SALES, INC.,

19
20
21

Counterclaimants,
v.
APPLIED LUBRICATION

22 TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Counter-Defendant.
GIL MARTINEZ
24
Counterclaimant,
25
v.
23

26

APPLIED LUBRICATION
27 TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Counter-Defendant.
28

Case No. 2:15-CV-04037-TJH-E

////////////////////
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
[JS-6]
[F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2)]

1

Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Applied Lubrication Technology, Inc.

2 (“Applied Lubrication”), Defendants and Counterclaimants Mighty Lube Systematic
3 Lubrication, Inc. and Mighty Lube USA Sales, Inc. (collectively, “Mighty Lube”),
4 and Defendant and Counterclaimant Gil Martinez (“Martinez”), having entered into a
5 Settlement Agreement and also having entered into and filed with the Court a
6 Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice pursuant To F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), and good
7 cause appearing therefor:
8
9

IT IS HERBY ORDERED that:

10
11

1.

All claims and counterclaims asserted in this action between Applied

12 Lubrication and Mighty Lube, and between Applied Lubrication and Martinez, are
13 hereby dismissed with prejudice;
14

2.

Applied Lubrication, Mighty Lube and Martinez shall each bear its or

15 his own respective fees and costs incurred herein; and
16

3.

The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties to enforce the terms of

17 the Settlement Agreement.
18
19
20 IT IS SO ORDERED:
21

JANUARY 21
22 DATED: ______________, 2016

_______________________________
Terry J. Hatter, Jr.
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
2