Daniel M. Davis v. Jack Fox
Filing
6
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter related to: Memorandum & Order, 5 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is summarily dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in the United States District Courts. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL M. DAVIS,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
v.
JACK FOX, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
) Case No. CV 15-4077-DOC (KK)
)
)
)
JUDGMENT
)
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
In accordance with the Order Summarily Dismissing Petition,
19
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is summarily dismissed without
20 prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases in the
21 United States District Courts.
22
23 DATED:
July 21, 2015
24
25
26
27
HON. DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
