Daniel A Borsotti v. The State of California et al

Filing 78

JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt Related to: Report and Recommendation 77 . The action is dismissed with prejudice as to the federal claims. See judgment for specifics. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ah)

JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DANIEL A. BORSOTTI,

12
13

Plaintiff,

Case No. CV 15-04112 JAK (AFM)
JUDGMENT

v.

14
15
16

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19

Pursuant to the Court’s Order Accepting the Report and Recommendation of
the United States Magistrate Judge,

20

The following IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

21

(1) The action is dismissed with prejudice as to the federal claims asserted

22

against: (i) the Judicial Defendants -- the Honorable Melvin Sandvig, the Honorable

23

Michael O’Gara, the Honorable Carol Koppel, the Honorable Jeffrey M. Harkavy,

24

the Honorable Martin R. Gladstein, the Honorable Susan K. Weiss, the Honorable

25

Sharon Lewis Miller, and the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles,

26

erroneously sued as Superior Court of California San Fernando Court, Chatsworth

27

Court, Van Nuys Court, Antelope Valley Court; and (ii) Christine Whitaker;

28

(2) The action is dismissed without leave to amend but without prejudice as

1

to: (i) the federal claims asserted against the City Defendants Luis Farfan, Marisol

2

Landeros and Christopher Vege; (ii) the federal claims asserted against Chris

3

Smith; (iii) the claims for injunctive and declaratory relief; and (iv) the state law

4

claims.

5
6

DATED: May 16, 2016

7
8
9

____________________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2