K. Mwasi v. David J. Montoya et al

Filing 33

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice: (1) plaintiff's claim that Does 1-10 and defendants Finander, Swaby, Belavich, Frances, and Walker viola ted the Eighth Amendment by being deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs; (2) plaintiff's claims based on the Plata v. Brown decree(s); and (3) plaintiff's claim defendants Finander, Swaby, Belavich, Frances, and Walker violated his due process rights by wrongfully denying his medical grievances. (jm)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KING MWASI, 12 v. 13 Plaintiff, 14 DAVID J. MONTOYA, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 15-4152 DOC (FFM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this 17 18 action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 19 (“Report”), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with 20 and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in 21 the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which 22 objections were directed. 23 IT IS ORDERED that the following claims are dismissed with prejudice: 24 (1) plaintiff’s claim that Does 1-10 and defendants Finander, Swaby, Belavich, 25 Frances, and Walker violated the Eighth Amendment by being deliberately indifferent to 26 his serious medical needs; (2) plaintiff’s claims based on the Plata v. Brown decree(s); and 27 28 /// 1 2 (3) plaintiff’s claim defendants Finander, Swaby, Belavich, Frances, and Walker violated his due process rights by wrongfully denying his medical grievances. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: May 24, 2017 DAVID O. CARTER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?