Jukin Media Inc. v. Defy Media LLC

Filing 34

STIPULATION OF DISMISSALAND STIPULATION OF ENTRYOF JUDGMENT IN THE EVENTOF DEFENDANT DEFAULT ONSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 33 ; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell as follows: The Parties agree that the matters set forth above are tru e and correct. To secure Defendants performance of the terms of the Parties'Settlement Agreement, the Parties executed on March 21, 2016, a Stipulation forJudgment and Stipulated Judgment in a principal amount equal to the Settlement Payment. (S ee attachment of this Order for further details). The Parties shall bear their own attorney fees and costs to date in this Action. Based on the foregoing, the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the parties settlement and otherwise dismisses this action in its entirety, subject to such retention of jurisdiction. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VENABLE LLP Douglas C. Emhoff (SBN 151049) demhoff@venable.com Tamany Vinson Bentz (SBN 258600) tjbentz@venable.com Schuyler B. Sorosky (SBN 265367) ssorosky@venable.com 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 229-9900 Facsimile: (310) 229-9901 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jukin Media, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JUKIN MEDIA, INC., a California corporation, 12 310-229-9900 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 VENABLE LLP 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2100 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, v. DEFY MEDIA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company Defendant. CASE NO. 2:15-cv-04411-BRO-GJS Hon. Beverly Reid O’Connell STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND STIPULATION OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN THE EVENT OF DEFENDANT DEFAULT ON SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Action Filed: June 10, 2015 Trial Date: Not set 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONSENT JUDGMENT 1 Plaintiff Jukin Media, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Defy Media LLC 2 (“Defendant”), hereby enter into this Stipulation of Dismissal subject to retention 3 of jurisdiction to enforce their Settlement Agreement, which is secured by this 4 Stipulation for Judgment in the Event of Defendant Default on Settlement 5 Agreement (“Stipulation”) as follows: 6 WHEREAS, on August 14, 2015, Plaintiff filed its operative First Amended 7 Complaint (“Complaint”) against Defendant in this action, seeking to recover 8 damages for the violation of its copyrights; and 9 Release, which is secured by Stipulated Judgment (“Settlement Agreement”); and WHEREAS, under the terms of the Settlement Agreement Defendant has 12 310-229-9900 11 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 VENABLE LLP 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2100 10 WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement and agreed to pay Plaintiff an amount pursuant to the payment schedule described in 13 the Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Payment”). 14 WHEREAS, the Parties agree and jointly request that this Court retain 15 jurisdiction to enforce the settlement, and otherwise dismiss this action in its 16 entirety, subject to such retention of jurisdiction. 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant as follows: 19 1. The Parties agree that the matters set forth above are true and correct. 20 2. To secure Defendants performance of the terms of the Parties’ 21 Settlement Agreement, the Parties executed on March 21, 2016, a Stipulation for 22 Judgment and Stipulated Judgment (“Stipulated Judgment”) in a principal amount 23 equal to the Settlement Payment. 24 3. In the event Defendant defaults by failing to timely and fully make 25 any payment due under the Settlement Agreement following application of the 26 notice and cure provisions set forth in the Settlement Agreement (a) Plaintiff is 27 hereby authorized to file an ex parte application to vacate the dismissal entered 28 hereunder and enter Judgment for the Settlement Payment against Defendant, less 1 CONSENT JUDGMENT 1 any payments made under the Settlement Agreement prior to default, plus interest 2 thereon at 7.5% per annum from the date of default; and (b) the Court is 3 authorized to enter an order vacating any dismissal and thereupon enter judgment 4 pursuant to this Stipulation on an ex parte basis. 5 6 7 4. No amendment, change or modification of this Stipulation shall be valid, unless in writing and signed by all of the parties hereto. 5. Except as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and Release, this 8 Stipulation constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties with 9 respect to its specific subject matter, and any and all prior agreements, understandings, or representations with respect to its subject matter are hereby 11 terminated and canceled in their entirety and are of no further force or effect. 12 310-229-9900 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 VENABLE LLP 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2100 10 13 6. The Parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs to date in this Action. 14 7. The Stipulated Judgment is exempt from the confidentiality 15 restrictions set forth in the Settlement Agreement, including Section 10. 16 17 18 8. The Stipulated Judgment may be entered by any Judge of the United States District Court, Central District of California. 9. This Court should (a) retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties 19 settlement, and (b) otherwise dismiss this action in its entirety, subject to such 20 retention of jurisdiction. 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 22 23 24 Jukin Media, Inc. By: Date Defy Media, LLC By: Date 25 26 27 28 2 CONSENT JUDGMENT 1 Based on the foregoing, the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the parties 2 settlement and otherwise dismisses this action in its entirety, subject to such 3 retention of jurisdiction. 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 6 Dated: May 3, 2016 7 8 HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 11 12 310-229-9900 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 VENABLE LLP 2049 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2100 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 CONSENT JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?