F.P.D., Inc., v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company et al

Filing 33

ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 31 , the Court orders that Plaintiff F.P.D., Inc. aka FPD, Inc.'s ("FPD") claims, as alleged against Defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company ("Hartf ord") in the complaint, and this entire action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Plaintiff FPD and defendant Hartford shall bear their own fees and costs. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. The Court Order re settlement conference 32 is also VACATED. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 F.P.D., INC. aka FPD, INC., 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, THE HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, THE HARTFORD GROUP, and DOES 1 to 10, 19 20 21 22 23 Defendants. ) Case No.: CV 15-4419-DMG (Ex) ) ) ) ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR ) DISMISSAL [31] ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 24 25 26 27 28 1 Order re Dismissal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of plaintiff F.P.D., Inc. aka FPD, Inc. (“FPD”) and defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company (“Hartford”), and good cause appearing therefor, hereby orders as follows: 1. Plaintiff FPD’s claims, as alleged against Hartford in the complaint, and this entire action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. Plaintiff FPD and defendant Hartford shall bear their own fees and costs; and 3. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. The Court Order re settlement conference [Doc. # 32] is also VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 DATED: January 11, 2016 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order re Dismissal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?