F.P.D., Inc., v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company et al
Filing
33
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 31 , the Court orders that Plaintiff F.P.D., Inc. aka FPD, Inc.'s ("FPD") claims, as alleged against Defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company ("Hartf ord") in the complaint, and this entire action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Plaintiff FPD and defendant Hartford shall bear their own fees and costs. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. The Court Order re settlement conference 32 is also VACATED. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
F.P.D., INC. aka FPD, INC.,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
vs.
HARTFORD CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY,
THE HARTFORD INSURANCE
COMPANY,
THE HARTFORD GROUP, and
DOES 1 to 10,
19
20
21
22
23
Defendants.
) Case No.: CV 15-4419-DMG (Ex)
)
)
) ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR
) DISMISSAL [31]
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
24
25
26
27
28
1
Order re Dismissal
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of plaintiff F.P.D., Inc. aka
FPD, Inc. (“FPD”) and defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
(“Hartford”), and good cause appearing therefor, hereby orders as follows:
1.
Plaintiff FPD’s claims, as alleged against Hartford in the
complaint, and this entire action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
2.
Plaintiff FPD and defendant Hartford shall bear their own fees
and costs; and
3.
All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. The Court
Order re settlement conference [Doc. # 32] is also VACATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
DATED: January 11, 2016
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Order re Dismissal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?