Terri Alves v. Zabrocki Real Estate Group

Filing 13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT [13, 14]in writing, by October 31, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. by Judge Otis D. Wright (DOCKETED ON THIS CASE IN ERROR, SHOULD BE UDNER CV 16-342ODW (RAO) SEALAND VS LOGISTIC NETWORK). (lc) Modified on 4/11/2016 (lc).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

United States District Court
Central District of California

8
9
10
11

SEALAND,

Case No. 2:16-cv-0342-ODW(RAO)
Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

14

LOGISTIC NETWORK OF AMERICA,

15

LLC,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Defendant.

SETTLEMENT [13, 14]

1

Plaintiff has filed a Request for an Interlocutory Dismissal. (ECF Nos. 13–14.)

2

In this Request, Plaintiff signals that the parties have reached a settlement agreement

3

in this matter, and asks the Court to dismiss the case without prejudice and reserve

4

Plaintiff’s right to reopen the case, should Defendant fail to meet the settlement’s

5

requirements on or before September 18, 2016. (Id. 2.)

6

The Court finds this method to be unnecessarily complicated, and instead issues

7

this ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by October 31, 2016, why settlement

8

has not been finalized. This Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter while

9

parties execute the terms of their settlement agreement. No hearing will be held. All

10

other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The

11

Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with

12

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, or the filing of a request for an extension.
Plaintiff’s Request for an Interlocutory Dismissal is also hereby STRUCK as

13
14

moot.

15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

DATE: April 11, 2016

19
20
21

____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2