Wilshire Commercial Capital, LLC v. Instant Financing, Inc, et al
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Refer to the Court's order for details. (pso)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
WILSHIRE COMMERCIAL
CAPITAL, LLC a Limited Liability
Company,
) CASE NO. 2:15-cv-04517 DSF(MRWx)
)
) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
) CONTEMPT
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
INSTANT FINANCING, INC. a
)
California Corporation dba 800 AUTO )
TITLE LOANS, INSTANT AUTO
)
TITLE LOANS, AND INSTANT PINK )
SLIP LOANS
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
________________________________ )
25
26
27
28
On February 22, 2016 the application of Plaintiff Wilshire Commercial
Capital, LLC for an order to show case as to why a contempt citation should not
issue against defaulted defendant Instant Financing Inc., came on for hearing
1
2
before this court. The application was granted. Instant Financing Inc. did not
appear at the hearing, has not appeared at any other hearings, and has not filed any
3
4
papers with this court including with relationship to the present application. Based
5
on the materials presented by Wilshire Commercial Capital, it appears that Instant
6
Financing, Inc. is in contempt of court. Therefore, Instant Financing Inc. is
7
8
ordered to show cause, in writing, why it should not be sanctioned for its contempt.
9
The written response is due no later than March 11, 2016. An inadequate response
10
or a failure to respond will result in a sanction of $300 per day until Instant
11
12
Financing, Inc. complies with the outstanding subpoena. A stipulation by the
13
parties that Instant Financing, Inc. has complied with the subpoena will constitute
14
an acceptable response to this order to show cause.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATE: 3/2/16
_____________________________________
Hon. Dale S. Fischer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?