Wilshire Commercial Capital, LLC v. Instant Financing, Inc, et al

Filing 36

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Refer to the Court's order for details. (pso)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 WILSHIRE COMMERCIAL CAPITAL, LLC a Limited Liability Company, ) CASE NO. 2:15-cv-04517 DSF(MRWx) ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE ) CONTEMPT Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) INSTANT FINANCING, INC. a ) California Corporation dba 800 AUTO ) TITLE LOANS, INSTANT AUTO ) TITLE LOANS, AND INSTANT PINK ) SLIP LOANS ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ________________________________ ) 25 26 27 28 On February 22, 2016 the application of Plaintiff Wilshire Commercial Capital, LLC for an order to show case as to why a contempt citation should not issue against defaulted defendant Instant Financing Inc., came on for hearing 1 2 before this court. The application was granted. Instant Financing Inc. did not appear at the hearing, has not appeared at any other hearings, and has not filed any 3 4 papers with this court including with relationship to the present application. Based 5 on the materials presented by Wilshire Commercial Capital, it appears that Instant 6 Financing, Inc. is in contempt of court. Therefore, Instant Financing Inc. is 7 8 ordered to show cause, in writing, why it should not be sanctioned for its contempt. 9 The written response is due no later than March 11, 2016. An inadequate response 10 or a failure to respond will result in a sanction of $300 per day until Instant 11 12 Financing, Inc. complies with the outstanding subpoena. A stipulation by the 13 parties that Instant Financing, Inc. has complied with the subpoena will constitute 14 an acceptable response to this order to show cause. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATE: 3/2/16 _____________________________________ Hon. Dale S. Fischer UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?