David Conrad v. D. Rodriguez et al

Filing 77

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge entered on April 11, 2018, remains the Court's final decision regarding this action. (iv)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
DAVID CONRAD,

Case No. CV 15-4537 MWF (SS)

11
Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

12
v.

OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND

13
D. Rodriguez, et al.,

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

14
Defendants.

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15
16
17

On June 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Magistrate

18

Judge’s Report and Recommendation.

19

conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report and

20

Recommendation

21

Objections do not cause the Court to alter its previous decision

22

to accept the Report and Recommendation.

23

Accepting

24

States Magistrate Judge entered on April 11, 2018, remains the

25

Court’s final decision regarding this action.

26

\\

27

\\

28

\\

to

Findings,

which

the

(Dkt. No. 75).

Objections

Conclusions

and

were

The Court has

directed.

The

Accordingly, the Order

Recommendations

of

United

1
2

The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this
Order on Plaintiff at his current address of record.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

DATED:

June 25, 2018

7
8

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2