Rigoberto Espinoza v. Beta Operating Company, LLC

Filing 22

JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Judgement is entered in favor of Defendant Beta Operating Company, LLC; Plaintiff takes nothing by his complaint and hsi complaint is dismissed with prejudice; and Defendant shall file a properly noticed motion before the Bill of Costs Clerk to seek to recover from Plaintiff its costs of suit herein. (bp)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

RIGOBERTO ESPINOZA as an
aggrieved employee pursuant to the
Private Attorneys General Act
(“PAGA”)

14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:15-cv-4659
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
[FED. R. CIV. P. 56]

vs.
BETA OPERATING COMPANY,
LLC, dba BETA OFFSHORE, a
Delaware limited liability company;
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 83818236.1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

1

On October 29, 2015, the Court issued an order granting, in full, Defendant

2

Beta Operating Company, LLC’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Judgment on the

3

Pleadings, finding there is no issue of material fact as to any of Plaintiff Richard

4

Espinoza’s claims and Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all of

5

Plaintiff’s claims.

6
7
8

The foregoing having fully adjudicated all causes of action in Plaintiff’s
operative complaint, the Court hereby enters judgment as follows:

9
10
11

1. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Beta Operating
Company, LLC;

12
13
14

2. Plaintiff takes nothing by his complaint and his complaint is
dismissed with prejudice; and

15
16
17

3. Defendant shall file a properly noticed motion before the Bill of
Costs Clerk to seek to recover from Plaintiff its costs of suit herein.

18
19
20

DATED: November 4, 2015

Hon. R. Gary Klausner
United States District Court Judge

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LEGAL_US_W # 83818236.1

-1-

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT