Kim Varnau et al v. Conti Electric Inc.
Filing
35
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF KIM VARNAU by Judge Dolly M. Gee. After consideration of the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to the Plaintiff Kim Varnau 34 , signed by counsel for Plaintiffs an d counsel for Defendant Conti Corporation, and good cause appearing therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this matter is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice as to Plaintiff Kim Varnau, with each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11 KIM VARNAU, RICHARD MORRIS,
RON WARNOCK, RICK SPRADLIN,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
vs.
Case No.: CV 15-4896-DMG (MRWx)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF
KIM VARNAU [34]
15
16
17
CONTI CORPORATION,
Defendant.
18
19
After consideration of the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice as to
20 the Plaintiff Kim Varnau, signed by counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for
21 Defendant Conti Corporation, and good cause appearing therein,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this matter is dismissed in its entirety,
23 with prejudice as to Plaintiff Kim Varnau, with each side to bear its own costs and
24 attorneys’ fees. All scheduled dates and deadlines are VACATED.
25
26 DATED: March 14, 2016
27
_________________________________
DOLLY M. GEE
UNITED STATES DICTRICT JUDGE
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF KIM VARNAU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?