Mary E. Nottage v. Six Unknown Los Angeles Police Officers and Unknown Employees of West Hills Hospital

Filing 28

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before June 21, 2016 why Plaintiff's state law claims should not be dismissed as to these defendants. Plaintiff may discharge this order b y filing an opposition to the motion to dismiss by or before June 20, 2016. If Plaintiff files an opposition on or before June 20, 2016, Defendant may file an optional reply on or before June 27, 2016, at which time the matter will be taken under submission. (See document for further details.) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Dismissal Form) (sbou)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NUMBER

Plaintiff(s),

v.

Defendant(s).

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT
TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: (Check one)
G This action is dismissed by the Plaintiff(s) in its entirety.
G The Counterclaim brought by Claimant(s)
dismissed by Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G The Cross-Claim brought by Claimants(s)
dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G The Third-party Claim brought by Claimant(s)
dismissed by the Claimant(s) in its entirety.

is

G ONLY Defendant(s)
is/are dismissed from (check one) G Complaint, G Counterclaim, G Cross-claim, G Third-Party Claim
brought by

.

The dismissal is made pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a) or (c).

Date

Signature of Attorney/Party

NOTE: F.R.Civ.P. 41(a): This notice may be filed at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or of a motion for
summary judgment, whichever first occurs.
F.R.Civ.P. 41(c): Counterclaims, cross-claims & third-party claims may be dismissed before service of a responsive
pleading or prior to the beginning of trial.

CV-09 (03/10)

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c)