Anthony Pesce v. Ecolab, Inc. et al

Filing 8

STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. See document for details. (smo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY PESCE,
Plaintiff,

12

ECOLAB, INC., et al.,
Defendant.

15
16

READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE
AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES.

17
18
19
20
21
22

This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. Both the
Court and the attorneys bear responsibility for the progress of litigation in the Federal
Courts. To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action, Fed. R.
Civ. P. 1, all counsel are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and the Local Rules of the Central District of California.

23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

24
25
26
27
28

STANDING ORDER

v.

13
14

Case No. CV15-5083 PA (PJWx)

1.

Service of the Complaint: The Plaintiff shall promptly serve the Complaint

in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and file the proofs of service pursuant to Local Rule
5-3.1.
2.

Presence of Lead Counsel: Lead trial counsel shall attend all proceedings

before this Court, including all status and settlement conferences.

1

3.

Discovery:
(a)

2

All discovery matters have been referred to a United States Magistrate

3

Judge, who will hear all discovery disputes. (The Magistrate Judge's initials follow the

4

Judge's initials next to the case number.) All discovery documents must include the words

5

"DISCOVERY MATTER" in the caption to ensure proper routing. Counsel are directed to

6

contact the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk to schedule matters for hearing.

7

Please do not deliver courtesy copies of these documents to this Court.

8
9

The decision of the Magistrate Judge shall be final, subject to modification by the
District Court only where it has been shown that the Magistrate Judge's Order is clearly

10

erroneous or contrary to law. Any party may file and serve a motion for review and

11

reconsideration before this Court. The moving party must file and serve the motion within

12

ten (10) days of service of a written ruling or within ten (10) days of an oral ruling that the

13

Magistrate Judge states will not be followed by a written ruling. The motion must specify

14

which portions of the ruling are clearly erroneous or contrary to law and support the

15

contention with points and authorities. Counsel shall deliver a conformed copy of the

16

moving papers and responses to the Magistrate Judge's clerk at the time of filing.
(b)

17

Unless there is a likelihood that upon motion by a party the Court

18

would order that any or all discovery is premature, it is advisable for counsel to begin to

19

conduct discovery actively before the Scheduling Conference. At the very least, the parties

20

shall comply fully with the letter and spirit of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a) and thereby obtain and

21

produce most of what would be produced in the early stage of discovery, because at the

22

Scheduling Conference the Court will impose tight deadlines to complete discovery.
(c)

23

If expert witnesses are to be called at trial, the parties shall designate

24

experts to be called at trial and provide reports required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B), not

25

later than eight weeks prior to the discovery cutoff date. Rebuttal expert witnesses shall be

26

designated and reports provided as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B), not later than

27

five weeks prior to the discovery cutoff date. Failure to timely comply with this deadline

28

may result in the expert being excluded at trial as a witness.
-2revised 9/11/13

1

4.

Electronic Filing:

2

As of November 1, 2007 for patent, trademark, and copyright cases, and January 1,

3

2008 for all other cases, the United States District Court for the Central District of California

4

requires electronic filing of documents in all new and pending civil cases. Information about

5

the Court’s Electronic Case Filing system (“ECF”) is available on the Court’s website at

6

www.cacd.uscourts.gov/cmecf.
All manually filed documents (those documents excused from the electronic filing

7
8

requirements by Local Rule 5-4.2) shall be served on the person as otherwise required by the

9

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules.

10

5.

Courtesy Copies:

11

Counsel are ordered to serve courtesy copies of all electronically filed documents,

12

and conformed courtesy copies of all manually filed documents, to the courtesy box next to

13

the entrance to chambers on the Spring Street level of the U.S. Courthouse, 312 North

14

Spring Street, by 12:00 noon of the business day following filing. Courtesy copies may be

15

delivered to chambers by either personally delivering them to the courtesy box or sending

16

them by guaranteed overnight delivery. If a courtesy copy is sent to chambers by guaranteed

17

overnight delivery, the sender shall notify the delivery service that the signature of the

18

recipient is not required.
6.

19

Motions:
(a)

20

Time for Filing and Hearing Motions: Motions shall be filed in

21

accordance with Local Rule 7.1/ This Court hears motions on Mondays, commencing at

22

1:30 p.m. No supplemental brief shall be filed without prior leave of Court. No motion

23

shall be noticed for hearing for more than thirty-five (35) days after service of the motion

24

unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

25
1/

26
27
28

Among other things, Local Rule 7-3 requires counsel to engage in a pre-filing
conference “to discuss thoroughly . . . the substance of the contemplated motion and any
potential resolution.” Counsel should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion is still
necessary, the briefing may be directed to those substantive issues requiring resolution by
the Court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other nonsubstantive matters during
the conference.
-3revised 9/11/13

Many motions to dismiss or to strike could be avoided if the parties confer in good

1
2

faith (as they are required to do under L.R. 7-3), especially for perceived defects in a

3

complaint, answer or counterclaim which could be corrected by amendment. See Chang v.

4

Chen, 80 F.3d 1293, 1296 (9th Cir. 1996) (where a motion to dismiss is granted, a district

5

court should provide leave to amend unless it is clear that the complaint could not be saved

6

by any amendment). Moreover, a party has the right to amend his complaint “once as a

7

matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a).

8

A 12(b)(6) motion is not a responsive pleading and therefore plaintiff might have a right to

9

amend. See Nolen v. Fitzharris, 450 F.2d 958, 958-59 (9th Cir. 1971); St. Michael’s

10

Convalescent Hospital v. California, 643 F.2d 1369, 1374 (9th Cir. 1981). And even where

11

a party has amended his Complaint once or a responsive pleading has been served, the

12

Federal Rules provide that leave to amend should be “freely given when justice so requires.”

13

F.R.Civ.P. 15(a). The Ninth Circuit requires that this policy favoring amendment be applied

14

with “extreme liberality.” Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Rose, 893 F.2d 1074, 1079

15

(9th Cir. 1990).

16

evaluate the defendant’s contentions as to the deficiencies in the complaint and in many

17

instances, the moving party should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable

18

defect.

19

These principles require that counsel for the plaintiff should carefully

In the unlikely event that motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 challenging pleadings are

20

filed after the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, the moving party shall attach a copy of the

21

challenged pleading to the Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of the motion.

22

The foregoing provisions apply as well to motions to dismiss a counterclaim, answer or

23

affirmative defense, which a plaintiff might file.
(b)

24

Length and Format of Motion Papers: Memoranda of Points

25

and Authorities in support of or in opposition to motions shall not exceed 25 pages.

26

Replies shall not exceed 12 pages. Only in rare instances and for good cause shown will the

27

Court grant an application to extend these page limitations.

28
-4revised 9/11/13

1

Typeface shall comply with Local Rule 11-3.1.1. NOTE: If Times Roman font is

2

used, the size must be no less than 14; if Courier is used, the size must be no less than

3

12. Footnotes shall be in typeface no more than one size smaller than text size and shall be

4

used sparingly.

5
6

Filings which do not conform to the Local Rules and this Order will not be
considered.
(c)

7

Citations to Case Law: Citations to case law must identify not only

8

the case being cited, but the specific page being referenced. Certain kinds of authority are

9

considered more useful – or authoritative – than others. If more than one authority is cited

10

in support of a proposition, these supporting authorities are to be listed such that the more

11

authoritative ones appear first.

12

(d)

Citations to Other Sources: Counsel are reminded that the basic

13

purpose of a legal citation is to allow the reader to locate a cited source accurately and

14

efficiently. Accordingly, statutory references should identify, with specificity, which

15

sections and subsections are being referenced (e.g., Jurisdiction over this cause of action

16

may appropriately be found in 47 U.S.C. § 33, which grants the district courts jurisdiction

17

over all offenses of the Submarine Cable Act, whether the infraction occurred within the

18

territorial waters of the United States or on board a vessel of the United States outside said

19

waters). Statutory references which do not indicate specifically which section and

20

subsection are being referred to (e.g., Plaintiffs allege conduct in violation of the Federal

21

Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511, et seq.) are to be avoided.

22

Citations to treatises, manuals, and other materials should similarly include the volume and

23

the section being referenced.

24

7.

Proposed Orders: Each party filing or opposing a motion or seeking the

25

determination of any matter shall serve and lodge a Proposed Order setting forth the relief or

26

action sought and a brief statement of the rationale for the decision with appropriate

27

citations. If the Proposed Order exceeds two pages, the proposing party shall also submit a

28
-5revised 9/11/13

1

copy of the Proposed Order to the Court’s ECF e-mail address, in WordPerfect format (X6

2

or earlier versions) or Microsoft Word (Word 2010 or earlier versions).

3

8.

Ex Parte Applications: Counsel are reminded ex parte applications are solely

4

for extraordinary relief. See Mission Power Engineering Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.,

5

883 F. Supp. 488 (C.D. Cal. 1995). Applications which fail to conform with Local Rules 7-

6

19 and 7-19.1, including a statement of opposing counsel's position, will not be

7

considered. Any opposition must be filed not later than 24 hours after service. If counsel do

8

not intend to oppose the ex parte application, counsel must inform the court clerk by

9

telephone. The Court considers ex parte applications on the papers and usually does not set

10

these matters for hearing. Counsel shall deliver a courtesy copy of moving, opposition, or

11

notice of non-opposition papers to the courtesy box outside the entrance to chambers on the

12

Spring Street level of the U.S. Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street. The Courtroom Deputy

13

Clerk will notify counsel of the Court's ruling or a hearing date and time, if the Court

14

determines a hearing is necessary.

15

9.

Under Seal Filings: Judge Anderson is participating in the Central District of

16

California’s Pilot Project for the Electronic Submission and Filing of Under Seal

17

Documents.

18

Parties shall make every effort to limit the number and volume of under seal filings.

19

In most circumstances, parties should seek to file under seal only the specific exhibits or

20

documents for which there is a valid basis for filing under seal.

21

When seeking the Court’s approval for an under seal filing, the submitting party shall

22

electronically file an Ex Parte Application to Seal and proposed Order through the Court’s

23

CM/ECF System pursuant to Local Rule 5-4. The Ex Parte Application and proposed Order

24

shall not contain the information the party seeks to file under seal. The party seeking

25

permission to file under seal shall submit to the Court’s generic chambers e-mail address

26

([e-mail]) PDF versions of the Ex Parte Application, proposed

27

Order, Declaration in Support of Ex Parte Application stating the reason for the under seal

28

filing, and the document(s) and/or exhibit(s) the party seeks to file under seal. The party
-6revised 9/11/13

1

shall also submit a WordPerfect format (X6 or earlier versions) or Microsoft Word (Word

2

2010 or earlier versions) version of the proposed Order to the generic chambers e-mail

3

address.

4

Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the submitting party shall deliver a

5

Mandatory Chambers Copy of the Ex Parte Application, proposed Order, Declaration in

6

Support of Ex Parte Application, and the document(s) and/or exhibit(s) the party seeks to

7

file under seal to the Court’s courtesy copy box located outside chambers no later than 12:00

8

p.m. on the following business day.

9
10
11

The Pilot Project for the Electronic Submission and filing of Under Seal Documents
does not apply to in camera submissions.
10.

Applications or Stipulations to Extend the Time to File any Required

12

Document or to Continue any Pretrial or Trial Date: No stipulations extending

13

scheduling requirements or modifying applicable rules are effective until and unless the

14

Court approves them. Both applications and stipulations must be filed in advance of the date

15

due and set forth:
(a)

16
17

the existing due date or hearing date as well as the discovery cutoff

date, the last date for hearing motions, the pre-trial conference date and the trial date;
(b)

18

specific, concrete reasons supporting good cause for granting the

19

extension. In this regard, a statement that an extension “will promote settlement” is

20

insufficient. The requesting party or parties must indicate the status of ongoing negotiations:

21

(i.e., have written proposals been exchanged? Is counsel in the process of reviewing a draft

22

settlement agreement? Has a mediator been selected?);
(c)

23
24
25

whether there have been prior requests for extensions, and whether

these were granted or denied by the Court.
11.

TROs and Injunctions: Parties seeking emergency or provisional relief shall

26

comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 and Local Rule 65. The Court will not rule on any

27

application for such relief for at least 24 hours after the party subject to the requested order

28

has been served; such party may file opposing or responding papers in the interim. The
-7revised 9/11/13

1

parties shall lodge a courtesy copy, conformed to reflect that it has been filed, of all papers

2

relating to TROs and injunctions. The courtesy copy shall be placed in the courtesy box

3

outside the entrance to chambers. All such papers shall be filed “loose” – i.e., not inside

4

envelopes.

5

12.

Cases Removed From State Court: All documents filed in state court,

6

including documents appended to the complaint, answers and motions, must be refiled in

7

this Court as a supplement to the Notice of Removal, if not already included. See 28 U.S.C.

8

§ 1447(a)(b). If the defendant has not yet responded, the answer or responsive pleading

9

filed in this Court must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the

10

Local Rules of the Central District. If a motion was pending in state court before the case

11

was removed, it must be re-noticed in accordance with Local Rule 7.

12

13.

ERISA Cases: Absent an agreed upon statement of facts, the court will not

13

hear motions for summary judgment, but will hear motions to determine the standard of

14

review and the scope of the administrative record. See Kearney v. Standard Ins. Co., 175

15

F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 1999). There will be a court trial (usually confined to oral argument) on

16

the administrative record.

17

14.

Consent to Magistrate Judge: The parties may consent to have a United

18

States Magistrate Judge preside over the entire case, including trial. The parties are free to

19

select from amongst all the magistrate judges available for this purpose, not just the

20

magistrate judge assigned to this case. (Please consult the court's website for the list of the

21

available magistrate judges.)

22

15.

Status of Fictitiously Named Defendants: This Court intends to adhere to

23

the following procedures where a matter is removed to this Court on diversity grounds with

24

fictitiously named defendants referred to in the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(a), 1447.
(a)

25

Plaintiff is normally expected to ascertain the identity of and serve

26

any fictitiously named defendants within 120 days of the removal of the action to

27

this Court.

28
-8revised 9/11/13

(b)

1

If plaintiff believes (by reason of the necessity for discovery or

2

otherwise) that fictitiously named defendants cannot be fully identified within the 120-day

3

period, an ex parte application requesting permission to extend that period to effectuate

4

service may be filed with this Court. Such application shall state the reasons therefor, and

5

may be granted upon a showing of good cause. The ex parte application shall be served

6

upon all appearing parties, and shall state that appearing parties may comment within seven

7

(7) days of the filing of the ex parte application.
(c)

8
9

If plaintiff desires to substitute a named defendant for one of the

fictitiously named parties, plaintiff first shall seek to obtain consent from counsel for the

10

previously-identified defendants (and counsel for the fictitiously named party, if that party

11

has separate counsel). If consent is withheld or denied, plaintiff may apply ex parte

12

requesting such amendment, with notice to all appearing parties. Each party shall have

13

seven calendar days to respond. The ex parte application and any response should comment

14

not only on the substitution of the named party for a fictitiously named defendant, but on the

15

question of whether the matter should thereafter be remanded to the Superior Court if

16

diversity of citizenship is destroyed by the addition of the new substituted party. See 28

17

U.S.C. § 1447(c)(d).

18

16.

Bankruptcy Appeals: Counsel shall comply with the Notice Regarding

19

Appeal from Bankruptcy Court issued at the time the appeal is filed in the District Court.

20

The matter is considered submitted upon the filing of the appellant’s reply brief. No oral

21

argument is held unless otherwise ordered by this Court.

22

17.

Communications with Chambers: Counsel shall not attempt to contact the

23

Court or its chambers staff by telephone or by any other ex parte means, although counsel

24

may contact the Courtroom Deputy, at [phone], with appropriate inquiries. To

25

facilitate communication with the Courtroom Deputy, counsel should list their facsimile

26

transmission numbers along with their telephone numbers on all papers.

27
28
-9revised 9/11/13

1

18.

Notice of this Order: Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order

2

on all parties, including any new parties to the action. If this case came to the Court by

3

noticed removal, defendant shall serve this Order on all other parties.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 7, 2015

6

___________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-10revised 9/11/13