United States of America et al v. Davita Healthcare Partners Inc. et al

Filing 84

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: This matter came before the Court upon theMotion of Defendants DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc. and Total Renal Care, Inc.(DaVita) to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. the Court granted the Motion and dismissed t he Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend. It is hereby Ordered: 1. Judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of DaVita on each claim alleged in the Second Amended Complaint; 2. The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment in favor of DaVita; 3. Plaintiff shall take nothing by the Second Amended Complaint; and 4. DaVita, as the prevailing party, is entitled to recover its costs of suit. (lc)

1
2
3

January 18,2017

4

VC
P

5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WESTERN DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX
REL NASRIN
YOUSEFMORROWATTI,

Case No. 2:15-CV-05225-SJO (PJWx)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[PROPOSED]

JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,
v.
DAVITA HEALTHCARE
PARTNERS, INC., and TOTAL
RENAL CARE, INC.,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES

\\LA - 037987/000025 - 1639541 v1

1

TO ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

2

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this matter came before the Court upon the

3

Motion of Defendants DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc. and Total Renal Care, Inc.

4

(“DaVita”) to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned

5

matter (the “Motion”). (Dkt. 75.) For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Minute

6

Order dated January 6, 2017 (Dkt. 82), the Court granted the Motion and dismissed

7

the Second Amended Complaint without leave to amend.

8

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as

9

follows:

10

1.

11

Judgment is entered against Plaintiff and in favor of DaVita on each

claim alleged in the Second Amended Complaint;

12

2.

The Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment in favor of DaVita;

13

3.

Plaintiff shall take nothing by the Second Amended Complaint; and

14

4.

DaVita, as the prevailing party, is entitled to recover its costs of suit

15

pursuant to Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 54-1 et seq.

16

of the Civil Local Rules.

17
18

January 18, 2017

Dated: ________________________

______________________________
Hon. S. James Otero
District Court Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OGAN L OVEL LS US
LLP

-2-

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES

\\LA - 037987/000025 - 1639541 v1

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT