Carl Hammarlund v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
Filing
16
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott 14 . (san)
1 Michael K. Brown (SBN 104252)
Email: mkbrown@reedsmith.com
2 Kevin G. Lohman (SBN 222678)
Email: klohman@reedsmith.com
3 REED SMITH LLP
355 South Grand Avenue
4 Suite 2900
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514
5 Telephone: +1 213 457 8000
Facsimile: +1 213 457 8080
6
Attorneys for Defendants
7 C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CARL HAMMARLUND
11
12
Plaintiff,
vs.
13
C.R. BARD, INC., a Delaware
14 corporation; DAVOL, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 THROUGH
15 100, inclusive,
16
17
Defendants.
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Complaint Filed: May 7, 2015
Case Removed: July 21, 2015
Honorable Steven V. Wilson, District
Court Judge
Honorable John E. McDermott,
Magistrate Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
2
3
WHEREAS during disclosure and discovery proceedings in this action, certain
4 documents and information have been or may be requested, sought, produced, or
5 exhibited by, between, and among the parties to this action, which relate to or contain
6 “confidential information” that consists of the parties’ trade secrets; confidential
7 research, development, or proprietary commercial information; or confidential and
8 private psychiatric, psychological, medical condition, and/or employment
9 information; which is entitled to protection from disclosure outside this litigation and
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10 is subject to a protective order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil
11 Procedure; and
12
WHEREAS, the parties to this action, through their respective counsel, have
13 agreed that a protective order preserving the confidentiality of certain documents and
14 information should be entered by the Court.
15
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE THAT IT SHALL BE HEREBY
16 ORDERED that:
17
18
1.
This Protective and Confidentiality Order (“Protective Order”)
19 shall govern confidential, proprietary and other protected information that may be
20 disclosed during the course of Carl Hammarlund v. C. R. Bard, Inc., et al. (“this
21 Action”) by C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”) and Davol, Inc. (“Davol”) and the individually
22 named plaintiff in this Action (“the Parties”).
23
2.
For purposes of this Protective Order, any Party may designate as
24 “Confidential Material” any information reasonably and in good faith believed to be
25 suitable for protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or other applicable
26 law that is contained in any document, written discovery response, testimony, or other
27 material produced or provided by that Party or its representative(s) to one or more of
28
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–1–
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 the other Parties, whether provided voluntarily, pursuant to formal discovery
2 procedures, or otherwise.
3
3.
Any Party may designate a document as Confidential Material by
4 stamping it “Confidential,” “Subject to Protective Order” or a substantial equivalent of
5 either of these legends. All pages of any document that bears such a legend are
6 subject to this Protective Order.
7
4.
A Party may designate a document as Confidential Material after
8 such document has been produced to another Party in the course of this Action by
9 noticing each Party of the retroactive designation.
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
5.
If responses to interrogatories, requests for admission, or other
11 written responses to discovery quote, summarize, or contain Confidential Material, the
12 Parties may designate them as Confidential Material by marking the face of any such
13 response with one of the legends set forth in paragraph (3) above and indicating the
14 page and line references of the material that is to be subject to this Protective Order.
15
6.
The Parties may designate the transcript of any deposition in this
16 Action or any portion thereof, including exhibits thereto, as Confidential Material by
17 so advising the court reporter and the Parties on the record during the taking of the
18 deposition or by written notification no later than thirty (30) calendar days after the
19 court reporter provides the parties with the final transcript. If all or any portion of a
20 deposition is designated as being subject to this Protective Order, the court reporter
21 and any Parties possessing any transcripts shall label the cover page of each transcript
22 or copy thereof to state that the deposition includes Confidential Material, and shall
23 label as confidential each of the pages of the transcript or exhibits that contain
24 Confidential Material. Any such depositions or exhibits that are filed with the Court
25 shall be filed under seal in accordance with Local Rule 79-5.
26
7.
Written and oral communications between or among counsel for
27 the Parties that quote from or describe or discuss the contents of Confidential Material
28 automatically shall be subject to this Protective Order.
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–2–
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
8.
1
Confidential Material shall be treated by the Parties and their
2 counsel as being confidential and private. Any copy made of Confidential Material
3 shall have the same status as the original. The disclosure and use of Confidential
4 Material shall be confined to the permissible disclosures and uses set forth below, and
5 in no event shall a Party make any disclosure or use of Confidential Material unless it
6 is reasonably necessary to effectively prosecute their respective claims and defenses in
7 this Action. All other disclosure and use of Confidential Material during the pendency
8 of this Action or after its termination is hereby prohibited.
9.
9
Confidential Material may be disclosed only to the following
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10 persons and only insofar as it is reasonably necessary to the effective prosecution of
11 the Parties’ claims and defenses:
12
a.
Parties, their representatives, in-house counsel and regular employees
13 who are actively engaged in, or actively overseeing this Action;
14
b.
Counsel of record, their associated attorneys, and support staff; including
15 paralegal and secretarial personnel;
16
c.
Experts and consultants (including their employees) who are retained by
17 a Party to assist in the litigation of this Action;
18
d.
Third-party contractors and their employees who are retained by one or
19 more Parties to provide litigation-support or copy services in connection with the
20 litigation of this Action;
21
e.
Witnesses or prospective witnesses in this Action;
22
f.
Court reporters and other persons involved in recording deposition
23 testimony in this Action;
24
g.
Court personnel, the United States District Court for the Central District
25 of California, or, if on appeal, of a court with appellate jurisdiction; and
26
h.
Jurors in this action.
27
Counsel for each Party disclosing Confidential Material in accordance with this
28 paragraph shall advise each person to whom such disclosure is made (except Court
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–3–
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 personnel and jurors) of the terms of this Protective Order and of the obligation of
2 each such person to comply with those terms. Each Party retaining such experts
3 and/or consultants will be responsible to ensure that they have read the terms of this
4 Protective Order and have had an opportunity to ask about their obligations with those
5 terms. Counsel shall require that each such person sign an agreement to be bound by
6 the Protective Order, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Counsel shall maintain a
7 list of persons to whom confidential materials are disclosed (excluding jurors and
8 Court personnel). The list of those designated experts who have signed onto this
9 Confidentiality Order will not be provided to the opposing side until such time as the
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10 Court designates the expert disclosure deadline. Any non-disclosed consultants’
11 protective orders will be kept by the respective retaining side’s attorneys in
12 observance of the attorney work product privilege and only with good cause shown
13 and Court Order will this list be disclosed to the opposing side. Upon learning of any
14 disclosure of Confidential Material to any person not authorized by this paragraph to
15 receive Confidential Material, the Party who so learns shall immediately (i) inform in
16 writing the Party from which the Confidential Material was originally received of such
17 disclosure, including to whom the material was disclosed, and (ii) take all necessary
18 steps to retrieve as soon as possible each and every copy of all Confidential Material
19 from the unauthorized person and any person to whom the unauthorized person
20 disclosed the Confidential Material.
21
10.
Each Party agrees that in the event it is served by a non-party with
22 a subpoena or request for production of Confidential Material originally received from
23 another Party, it will give sufficient notice to allow that Party a reasonable opportunity
24 to intervene to oppose such production. Any person to whom confidential materials
25 are provided under Paragraph 9, except for court personnel or jurors, shall also be
26 bound by this term.
27
11.
Disclosure of Confidential Material in accordance with paragraph
28 (8) above shall not effect, nor shall it be deemed to effect, a waiver of the attorneyCase No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–4–
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 client privilege, the work-product immunity, or any other privilege or immunity from
2 disclosure to which such Confidential Material may be entitled, whether in this Action
3 among the Parties herein or in any other action or as to any non-party.
12.
4
Should any Party to whom Confidential Material is disclosed
5 object to the designation of that material as proprietary, confidential, or otherwise
6 protected, it shall make a good-faith effort to resolve the dispute informally with the
7 disclosing Party. Except where good cause is shown, all objections to the designation
8 of documents as Confidential Material must be interposed in writing, describing the
9 challenged documents by bates number, no later than 60 days before trial, or such
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10 objections shall be deemed waived. Should the Parties be unable to resolve the
11 dispute, the Party opposing the inclusion of such material under this Protective Order,
12 within thirty days from receipt of the letter challenging the confidentiality of any
13 documents, may apply to the Court by motion for a ruling that the information should
14 not be entitled to protection under this Protective Order. The Party opposing such
15 designation need only identify the document in a simple motion to subject to Court
16 review. The Party designating the material as confidential shall have the burden of
17 proving that said material is subject to protection. Until such time as the Court rules
18 on the motion, the material that is the subject of the dispute shall continue to be
19 subject to this Protective Order. In no circumstance may challenges to designations of
20 Confidential Material be made after this case is finally determined as to the
21 challenging party.
13.
22
The inadvertent production by any party in the course of discovery
23 in these proceedings of a document subject to a claim of privilege, work product, or
24 other statutory or court-ordered confidentiality, will not result in a waiver of any of
25 the foregoing protections, whether in these or any other proceedings, for the produced
26 document or any other withheld document covering the same or similar subject
27 matter.
28
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–5–
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
14.
Confidential Material shall be used (if otherwise relevant and
2 admissible) solely in this Action and any underlying case consolidated in this Court
3 for discovery purposes in accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order, and
4 such Confidential Material shall not be used in any other legal action or proceeding or
5 for any other purpose without further order of this Court.
6
15.
Confidential Material may be provided to the Court in connection
7 with any pleading, motion, or other paper filed with the Court in this Action. The
8 Party providing such Confidential Material to the Court shall mark one of the legends
9 set forth in Paragraph 3 above on each page of the filing that contains such material.
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10 Any pleading, motion, or other paper filed with the Court containing Confidential
11 Material shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court under seal in accordance with Local
12 Rule 79-5. Such papers filed under seal shall not be unsealed or made a part of the
13 public record except by further order of this Court.
14
16.
If during the course of document production it becomes known that
15 certain Confidential Material has been produced inadvertently, such inadvertent
16 production does not waive any privilege or claim of confidentiality that a Party may
17 possess as to that Confidential Material. The Party who receives any Confidential
18 Material shall notify the Party who produced those documents within fourteen days of
19 first discovering such inadvertent disclosure. That Party shall also not make any
20 reproductions of any form of those documents, and if any reproductions were made
21 prior to discovery of the documents confidentiality, that Party shall return any copies
22 along with the original to the producing Party. Under no circumstances shall any
23 Party use information obtained through an inadvertent disclosure to its benefit or the
24 producing Party’s detriment. Further, any Party who discloses any information
25 contained in inadvertently produced Confidential Material to any person not a Party to
26 or covered under this Protective Order shall be deemed in violation of this Protective
27 Order. A party may oppose the designation of documents as inadvertently produced
28 in accordance with the procedure set up in Paragraph 12 above, except that the party
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–6–
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 opposing such designation must do so within 30 days of being notified by the
2 producing party of the inadvertent production.
3
If a producing Party discovers that it has inadvertently produced confidential
4 documents to another Party, it shall within thirty days of such discovery ask for the
5 return of such documents, including any copies, from the Party who inadvertently
6 received any confidential document.
7
17.
The use in this litigation of a confidential document by the
8 disclosing party shall not constitute a waiver of confidentiality. Other uses or
9 disclosures of confidential documents may or may not create a waiver, depending on
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10 applicable law.
11
18.
Upon written demand by a Party, to be made within thirty days
12 after the final determination of this Action or all related actions, as defined previously,
13 as to the party to whom the documents were produced and, for material not specific to
14 a particular case, the final determination of any other action of which the same
15 counsel is counsel of record counsel of record for each Party receiving Confidential
16 Material shall assemble and return all such material to the disclosing Party or,
17 alternatively, shall immediately destroy all such material. All attorneys of record
18 shall, within forty-five days of an initial written demand under this paragraph, certify
19 that all Confidential Material, including any such material disclosed to any other
20 entity, has been returned or destroyed. The sole exception to the requirements
21 described above is that information that has been incorporated into attorney work
22 product or other privileged documents need not be returned or destroyed. Such
23 information shall be retained by the person to whom the information was produced,
24 and shall be treated as Confidential Material in accordance with this Order.
25
19.
Each Party shall retain all rights and remedies available to it under
26 the law for the enforcement of this other against anyone who violates it.
27
28
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–7–
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
20.
The restrictions of this Protective Order shall continue to apply
2 after this case is finally determined and the Court shall retain jurisdiction for all
3 purposes in connection therewith.
4
ORDER
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8 DATED: 8/19/2015
Honorable John E. McDermott
9
United States Magistrate Judge
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
11
CONSENTED TO BY:
12
13 DATED: August 18, 2015
REED SMITH LLP
14
By: /s/ Kevin G. Lohman
Michael K. Brown
Kevin G. Lohman
15
16
Attorneys for Defendants
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
17
18
19 DATED: August 18, 2015
20
ORLAND LAW GROUP
21
By: /s/ Jeffrey J. Olin
James J. Orland
Jeffrey J. Olin
22
23
24
Attorneys for Plaintiff
I, Kevin G. Lohman, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf the
25 filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.
26
27
By: /s/ Kevin G. Lohman
Kevin G. Lohman
28
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–8–
STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
EXHIBIT A
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
EXHIBIT A TO STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 CARL HAMMARLUND
13
Plaintiff,
14 vs.
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
AGREEMENT TO MAINTAIN
CONFIDENTIALITY
15 C.R. BARD, INC., a Delaware
corporation; DAVOL, INC., a Delaware
16 corporation; and DOES 1 THROUGH
100, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
.
19
20
21
I, ____________________ [Name – Print or Type], have been given and read a
22 copy of Stipulated Protective Order, dated _________, in this case, Carl Hammarlund
23 v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al., United States District Court for the Central District of
24 California, Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM.
25
I understand and will strictly adhere to the contents of said order. I understand
26 that produced material disclosed to me is subject to the order of the United States
27 District Court for the Central District of California, and that I am prohibited from
28 copying, disclosing or otherwise using such material except as provided by said court
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–1–
AGREEMENT TO MAINTAIN CONFIDENTIALITY
1 order. I understand that unauthorized disclosure of the stamped confidential
2 information may constitute contempt of court and agree to be subject to personal
3 jurisdiction of this Court for the purpose of enforcing my obligations under this
4 Agreement, the order, and any contempt proceeding that may be instituted for alleged
5 violation thereto. I understand also that my execution of this Agreement to Maintain
6 Confidentiality, indicating my agreement to be bound by said order, is a prerequisite
7 to my review of any produced document and materials.
8
9
REED SMITH LLP
A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
10
Date _________________
11
_____________________________
Print Name
_____________________________
Signature
12
13
14
US_ACTIVE-123027890.1
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:15-cv-05506-SVW-JEM
–2–
AGREEMENT TO MAINTAIN CONFIDENTIALITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?