Anthony Edwards v. A. Arutyunyan et al

Filing 59

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm re Stipulation for Protective Order 52 (see attached) (jm)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
v.

14
15

Case No. 2:15-cv-5564-SJO (FFMx)

ANTHONY EDWARDS,

Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE
ORDER

A. ARUTYUNYAN,

16

Defendant.

17
18
19
20

Based on the stipulation of the parties filed concurrently herewith, and for
good cause shown, the Court makes the following orders:
1.

Plaintiff’s counsel shall maintain the confidentiality of the disclosed

21

portions of Plaintiff’s Confidential Inmate Central File (“C-File”) produced as an

22

initial disclosure by Defendant for “Attorney’s Eyes Only.” Specifically, Plaintiff’s

23

counsel shall take all reasonable steps to safeguard the disclosed portions of

24

Plaintiff’s Confidential C-File, and shall not disclose or disseminate the documents

25

or their content except as provided herein. Plaintiff’s counsel will not disseminate

26

or disclose the contents of the Confidential C-File to Plaintiff Anthony Edwards or

27

to third-parties, including experts and trial consultants, without first obtaining the

28
1

1

consent of Defendant’s counsel or an order from this Court authorizing such

2

disclosure.

3

2.

4
5

Plaintiff’s counsel shall not use the disclosed portions of Plaintiff’s

Confidential C-File for any reason other than prosecution of the claims in this case.
3.

Plaintiff’s counsel shall return the disclosed portions of Plaintiff’s

6

Confidential C-File, and any and all copies of documents, to Defendant’s counsel

7

within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of the proceedings against Defendant

8

Valenzuela, including any appeal.

9

4.

This Protective Order, and the obligations of all persons hereunder,

10

including those related to disclosure and use of the disclosed portions of Plaintiff’s

11

Confidential C-File, shall survive the final termination of this case, whether such

12

termination is by settlement, judgment, dismissal, appeal, or otherwise, until further

13

order of this Court.

14
15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 18, 2016

/S/ Frederick F. Mumm
The Hon. Frederick F. Mumm

17
18
19

LA2015602574
62138369.doc

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2