Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Taisei Construction Corporation

Filing 34

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real, re Stipulation 33 . See document for details. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC A. Eric Aguilera, Esq. (SBN 192390) Jason Y. Chao (SBN 250735) Aaron M. Daniels (SBN 279681) 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 T: 714-384-6600 / F: 714-384-6601 eaguilera@aguileragroup.com jchao@aguileragroup.com adaniels@aguileragroup.com 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 12 23 TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY ) Case No. 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW ) COMPANY OF AMERICA, a ) PROTECTIVE ORDER Connecticut corporation; ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TAISEI CONSTRUCTION ) CORPORATION, a Delaware ) Date Action Filed: July 27, 2015 corporation; and DOES 1 through 100 ) Trial Date: November 29, 2016 inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) 24 TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 After considering the stipulation filed by Plaintiff TRAVELERS PROPERTY 26 CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA (“Travelers”) and Defendant TAISEI 27 CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION (“Taisei”) on February 29, 2016, and good 28 cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. 1 This Protective Order shall govern all items or information that are 2 produced, disclosed, or generated in connection with discovery, including but not 3 limited to all discovery responses, deposition testimony, deposition exhibits or other 4 documents, including electronic media, and tangible materials of any kind, however 5 communicated, produced in this litigation (collectively referred to as “Materials”) that 6 the Parties to this action may designate as “CONFIDENTIAL.” As used herein, 7 “Parties” refers to the parties to this action. 2. 8 The Parties may designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” any Materials or 9 information of a proprietary, financial, or competitively sensitive nature; Materials or 10 information that is protected against disclosure to any non-Party by any applicable 11 privilege, work product protection, or other statutory or common law protection, 12 including Materials created or produced in connection with the Underlying Action; 13 research, technical, commercial or financial information that the producing Party has 14 maintained as confidential; confidential personal identification information; or any 15 confidential insurance information, including, but not limited to, any such claims 16 information, by placing in a conspicuous location on the Materials or information the 17 word “CONFIDENTIAL” or by informing all Parties in writing that a specific group 18 of clearly identified documents (identified by bates number or similar designation) are 19 confidential. 3. 20 By agreeing to the procedure set forth in this Protective Order to govern 21 how discoverable Materials and information 22 “CONFIDENTIAL,” produced, and handled in this litigation, no Party is waiving any 23 applicable privilege, work-product protection, fiduciary duty of loyalty or 24 confidentiality, or any statute, rule, or common law provision that prohibits or 25 restricts disclosure of any documents or other information to any other Party to this 26 litigation. Any Party claiming a right to receive documents or other information in 27 discovery in this action must support that claimed right independent of the existence 28 or contents of this Protective Order and cannot claim to have obtained any such right 2 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER are to be designated 1 by virtue of the existence or contents of this Protective Order. Nothing contained in 2 this Protective Order shall constitute an admission or determination that any Material 3 or information is confidential, subject to discovery, or protected from discovery. 4 4. All non-public material related to the representation and defense of 5 Taisei in the Underlying Action of Wilshire Vermont Housing Partners v. Taisei, et 6 al., filed in Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC504178, produced by the Parties 7 in the present action shall be presumed “CONFIDENTIAL” pursuant to the terms of 8 this Protective Order. 9 5. Any Party may also designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” any portion of a 10 deposition transcript of its agent or employee, the agent or employee of another Party, 11 or of a third party that contains confidential information relating to that Party by a 12 statement on the record at the time of the deposition or by written designation within 13 forty-five days after the deposition. If no indication on the record is made, all 14 Materials and information disclosed during a deposition shall be deemed 15 “CONFIDENTIAL” until the expiration of the forty-five day period within which any 16 Party may designate the Material or information as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 17 “CONFIDENTIAL” Material or information that is used in the taking of a deposition 18 shall remain subject to the provisions of this Protective Order, along with the 19 transcript pages of the deposition testimony that discuss the “CONFIDENTIAL” 20 Material or information. 21 6. Any No Materials or information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be 22 furnished, shown or otherwise disclosed to any person, except the following: 1) 23 counsel for the Parties and any attorneys, paralegals, assistants, clerks, and support 24 staff assisting such counsel; 2) essential employees of a Party, or other potential 25 witnesses, with whom it is considered in good faith necessary to consult in connection 26 with the prosecution or defense of this case; 3) qualified persons taking testimony, 27 including court reporters and videographers; 4) outside consultants and experts 28 retained by the Parties to consult and/or assist counsel in the preparation and trial of 3 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 this litigation; 5) the Court, jury, and court personnel; 6) document processing and 2 hosting vendors, and graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting services; 3 and 7) any mediator selected by the Parties or appointed by the Court to mediate the 4 claims at issue in this litigation and the support staff for the mediator. This restriction 5 on the disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Material may be modified by court order 6 and does not apply where the designating Party has given its written consent to the 7 disclosure. 8 9 7. All Materials or information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be used solely for the prosecution or defense of this litigation, including dispositive 10 motions, trial, and any related appellate proceeding. 11 confidential Materials or information in this litigation is made pursuant to and under 12 the protection of this Protective Order and such disclosure shall not be deemed a 13 waiver of any privilege, work product, trade secret, or other protections. A Party may 14 use for any purpose its own documents and information that it produces or discloses 15 in this litigation or obtains outside of this litigation and the use of such documents 16 and information shall not be considered a violation of this Protective Order. 17 8. The Parties’ disclosure of Before any consultants, experts, mediators, or non-Party witnesses or 18 potential witnesses, including any former employees, in this litigation receive or 19 review Materials or information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” counsel for the 20 Party making the disclosure shall provide to the person to whom disclosure is planned 21 or proposed a copy of the declaration in the form attached as Exhibit “A” to this 22 Protective Order. Counsel for the disclosing Party shall maintain a complete and 23 current file of Declarations so executed for at least two (2) years after this litigation is 24 finally terminated and shall be made available to counsel for any other Party upon a 25 showing that this Protective Order has been violated or may have been violated. This 26 paragraph does not apply when showing or providing Materials to witnesses at a 27 hearing, trial or deposition, or to any person who, as shown on the face of the 28 4 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 document, was an author, addressee, or recipient of the document, including a 2 recipient of a copy. 3 9. Nothing contained in this Protective Order bars or restricts the Parties’ 4 attorneys from rendering advice to their respective clients with respect to this 5 litigation. This Protective Order shall not prevent the use of “CONFIDENTIAL” 6 Materials or information in connection with a motion, at a hearing, at trial, or at a 7 deposition provided that the Materials shall be disclosed or displayed only upon the 8 implementation of reasonable safeguards to preserve their confidential status. Any 9 Party submitting evidence designated “CONFIDENTIAL” in connection with a 10 motion in this litigation shall lodge such evidence with the Court conditionally for 11 filing under seal, publicly file redacted versions of their papers which redact any 12 “CONFIDENTIAL” Materials, and serve on the Parties the redacted and non-redacted 13 version of the papers. If the Court requires any showing beyond the existence of this 14 Protective Order and a “CONFIDENTIAL” designation to accept evidence lodged 15 under seal, any Party seeking to have any part of the filing maintained under seal shall 16 have the burden of making the requisite showing, and shall file any supporting 17 materials with the Court, including, but not limited to a motion pursuant to Civil 18 Local Rule 79-5, within seven (7) days of the moving Party’s notice of lodgment. If 19 no such showing is made, or the Court deems that the attempted showing was 20 insufficient, the moving Party may file the evidence and unredacted papers with the 21 Court as part of public record. 22 “CONFIDENTIAL” Material or information conditionally under seal, the Party 23 intending to lodge the “CONFIDENTIAL” Material or information will endeavor to 24 contact the Party that designated the Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” to confirm that 25 the Party requires that the Material or information be conditionally filed under seal. 26 In the event that the Party that designated the Material or information as 27 “CONFIDENTIAL” does not require the Material or information to be filed under If possible, two (2) days prior to lodging any 28 5 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 seal, the Party filing the motion may file the motion and supporting Material without 2 sealing the “CONFIDENTIAL” Material or information. 3 10. The inadvertent or unintentional disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” 4 Materials or information, regardless of whether the Materials were designated as 5 “CONFIDENTIAL” at the time of disclosure, shall not be deemed a waiver of a 6 Party’s claim of confidentiality provided that the Party asserting the claim of 7 confidentiality informs all other Parties of its claim within a reasonable time after 8 learning of the disclosure. 9 11. The restrictions set forth in this Protective Order shall not apply to 10 Material or information disclosed in a manner that does not violate this Protective 11 Order. 12 12. Within sixty (60) days of the final termination of this litigation, 13 including all appeals, the Parties agree to destroy or return to the producing party all 14 copies, including electronic copies, of “CONFIDENTIAL” Materials produced in this 15 litigation. This provision shall not apply to copies of the pleadings or other court 16 filings, working files, claim files, litigation files, or similar material maintained by a 17 Party or its counsel in the ordinary course of maintaining and preserving files related 18 to this litigation and shall not apply to prevent counsel from retaining 19 “CONFIDENTIAL” Materials necessary to comply with the rules of professional 20 conduct. 21 pursuant to the express written agreement of the Party that designated the Materials as 22 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 13. A Party may also maintain copies of “CONFIDENTIAL” Materials Any Party may bring a motion to challenge the designation of Material 24 or information as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Any Party may also bring a motion to 25 challenge the limitations placed upon the use of any particular Material or 26 information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 27 Material or information as “CONFIDENTIAL” bears the burden of proving that the 28 Material or information is “CONFIDENTIAL” and entitled to the protections of this The Party that designated the 6 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Protective Order. Any Materials or information challenged pursuant to this paragraph 2 shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” pending the Court’s ruling on the motion 3 brought under this paragraph. 4 14. In the event that 1) any Party is served with a subpoena for the 5 production of Material or information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” in this 6 litigation and 2) the subpoena was issued by any person or entity that is a party in the 7 Underlying Action of Wilshire Vermont Housing Partners v. Taisei, et al., filed in 8 Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC504178, it shall be presumed that such 9 Material or information is protected from disclosure. This presumption is limited to 10 any Materials or information regarding the defense of Taisei in the Underlying Action 11 of Wilshire Vermont Housing Partners v. Taisei, et al., filed in Los Angeles Superior 12 Court Case No. BC504178. Any person or entity seeking the production of Material 13 or information that has been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” in this litigation that 14 is not a party to this litigation shall bear the burden of proving that it is entitled to the 15 Material or information after giving reasonable notice to the Party that designated the 16 Material or information as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 22 Dated: March 1, 2016 ________________________________ 23 MANUEL L. REAL 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 25 26 27 28 7 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 EXHIBIT A – 2 DECLARATION REGARDING CONFIDENTIALITY 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY ) Case No. 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW ) COMPANY OF AMERICA, a ) DECLARATION REGARDING Connecticut corporation; ) CONFIDENTIALITY ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) TAISEI CONSTRUCTION ) CORPORATION, a Delaware ) corporation; and DOES 1 through 100 ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) I hereby declare that: 16 1. I have been provided with a copy of the Protective Order for the case of 17 Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Taisei Construction 18 Corporation, bearing the case number of 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW for the United States 19 District Court for the Eastern District of California. I have read the Protective Order, 20 understand the terms of the Protective Order, and agree to be bound by the terms of 21 the Protective Order. 22 2. As required by the terms of the Protective Order, I will not make or 23 retain possession of copies of any Materials or information designated 24 “CONFIDENTIAL” and I will not use, disclose, make available, or otherwise 25 communicate confidential Materials or information in any manner except for the 26 purpose of my acting as an expert, consultant, and/or witness in the above-entitled 27 litigation. 28 /// 9 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 3. I acknowledge that my failure to abide by the terms of the Protective 2 Order and this Declaration may subject me to penalties if I am found to be in 3 contempt of Court. 4 5 6 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 7 8 ________________ ____________________ ______________________ 9 (Date of Signature) (City, State where Signed) (Signature of Declarant) 10 11 ______________________ 12 (Print Name of Declarant) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10 CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-05677-R-PJW PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?