Shelia Jackson-Murray v. City of Los Angeles, et al

Filing 24

ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. As the parties have stipulated 23 to a dismissal of this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a), and as all parties have agreed to bear their own costs and fees, the Court orders this matter dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each side to bear their own costs and fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 SHEILA JACKSON-MURRAY, individually and as a personal representative of the Estate of DAMON JACKSON, deceased, 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Rule 41(a) Plaintiff, 14 15 CASE NO. CV15-05838 CBM (MRWx) [JS-6] v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity; LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, a public entity; and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive, Defendants. 1 As the parties have stipulated to a dismissal of this action with prejudice 2 pursuant to Rule 41(a), and as all parties have agreed to bear their own costs and fees, 3 the Court orders this matter dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each side to bear 4 their own costs and fees. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: July 6, 2016 __________________________ Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?